The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of ³ÉÈË¿ìÊÖ and committees will automatically update to show only the ³ÉÈË¿ìÊÖ and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of ³ÉÈË¿ìÊÖ and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of ³ÉÈË¿ìÊÖ and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 3500 contributions
Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 22 January 2025
Audrey Nicoll
You mentioned forced marriage and honour killings, or one of the two—I cannot remember which. I am surprised that those issues are not included in the bill’s provisions. What is your comment on that type of violence not being included in the review process?
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 15 January 2025
Audrey Nicoll
I will bring in Sharon Dowey in a moment, but I want to ask about the recruitment and retention information that is helpfully set out in your annual report. Of course, none of the work that you do could happen without the quality and experience of your staff body. I note that on page 31 of your report, you make reference to the fact that the budget is set each year by the Scottish Government, that you are under the same pressures with regard to things like public sector pay rises as other bodies are, and that you had to submit a business case to
“request additional funding for staff costs on a recurring basis and temporary funding for legal fees.â€
Although the report says that you have a low staff turnover, which is really good, it also says that there will be retirals in the coming year. Can you say more about your priorities with regard to retaining an experienced and skilled staff body under the constraints that you face?
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 15 January 2025
Audrey Nicoll
We wish you well in whatever comes next for you. Thank you again for coming along today.
We move into private session.
11:09 Meeting continued in private until 11:55.Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 15 January 2025
Audrey Nicoll
I am sure that the benefits of body-worn video that you mentioned, and perhaps those of other digital transformation aspects, will come up in members’ questions.
That brings me on to looking forward. During our scrutiny of the Police (Ethics, Conduct and Scrutiny) (Scotland) Bill, we discussed the PIRC’s capacity, and we took evidence from you on that. What capacity and resourcing factors for the PIRC need to be considered for next year and beyond?
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 15 January 2025
Audrey Nicoll
That is correct.
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 15 January 2025
Audrey Nicoll
Thank you. The issue of recruitment was considered during the passage of the Police (Ethics, Conduct and Scrutiny) (Scotland) Bill. Personally, I am quite relaxed about it. I think that there is a need for a proportion of PIRC staff to have a real understanding of processes and procedures within policing, but I acknowledge some of the concerns that were raised around that. Will that issue need to be reviewed or considered, or are you content with the approach as it is at the moment?
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 15 January 2025
Audrey Nicoll
Thank you for those really well-made points.
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 15 January 2025
Audrey Nicoll
Thank you for that interesting update. While you were responding, I was wondering whether you have engaged with relevant partners on the change. You spoke about working on a business case and about engagement that is under way with the Scottish Government, so it will be interesting to monitor how that progresses.
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 15 January 2025
Audrey Nicoll
Thank you very much. One of the key things that you referenced in your opening remarks was the substantial increase in your workload, and you mentioned the complex and evolving nature of the type of investigations that you undertake. The report provides further detail on that.
I will pick out a couple of things. The examination of on-duty allegations of assault made against police officers remains one of your biggest areas of work, and the report highlights that the nature and type of referrals continue to evolve. For example, the report references referrals relating to the discharge of firearms by firearms officers during incidents involving XL bully dogs, so there are new and emerging types of activity. I am interested in hearing a wee bit more about what that looks like more broadly.
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 15 January 2025
Audrey Nicoll
In regard to having constituents who are very familiar with the work of the PIRC, that probably goes for us all.
If nobody else has any questions, I want to clarify one final point, which relates to Pauline McNeill’s question about the proposals on the presentation of cases at senior officer misconduct hearings. We did a wee check back of the Government’s response to our stage 1 report, in which the cabinet secretary said:
“Whilst this is not for the Bill itself, on balance, our intention is to consult on this when considering regulations with the Scottish Police Consultative Forum. My view is that PIRC are best placed to carry out this role. PIRC will have conducted the initial assessment, carried out the investigation and have all the documentation to present the case, though they may opt to procure the required skill set when necessary.â€
I just wanted to put that on the record in response to Pauline’s question. You may not be bothered about that, Michelle, given that, as I understand it, you conclude your tenure in early 2025.