The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of 成人快手 and committees will automatically update to show only the 成人快手 and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of 成人快手 and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of 成人快手 and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 3500 contributions
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 29 January 2025
Audrey Nicoll
Thank you鈥攖here are some really interesting points there. We may be straying slightly from the provisions, but you are helpfully circling them back to the review process that is being proposed.
With that, I bring in Liam Kerr.
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 29 January 2025
Audrey Nicoll
That was really helpful. A clear theme is emerging around the practicalities and cost implications.
I have one follow-up question, and I would welcome hearing from anyone who wanted to come in on it. Last week, we took evidence from, among others, Stuart Munro of the Law Society of Scotland, who referred to a piece of work that is supported by a working group convened by Sheriff Principal Aisha Anwar. It is looking specifically at the development of a virtual custody process to address the concerns that had been identified in the pilot of that process. Are any of you involved in that working group?
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 29 January 2025
Audrey Nicoll
That is super. I take it that you are involved, too, Laura Buchan.
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 29 January 2025
Audrey Nicoll
Thank you very much, Neil. Those were helpful opening comments.
I want to link the point about learning lessons with the question of what the experience of other jurisdictions has been. First, I will go to John Devaney and then I will jump back to Neil Websdale. Are there similar review systems in other jurisdictions that could inform our approach to considering the process of learning lessons from reviews? Do you think that the bill reflects what is necessary in that space鈥攊f that makes any sense?
12:00Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 29 January 2025
Audrey Nicoll
Thank you. I will bring in Professor Neil Websdale. I hope that you can hear us okay. We are interested in your initial thoughts on the proposals on the domestic homicide and suicide review process.
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 29 January 2025
Audrey Nicoll
I will bring in Neil Websdale on the broad question about lessons learned. I have a specific question within that about timescales. Once we have undertaken or completed the learning process, should timescales apply to how lessons are applied in changing practices?
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 29 January 2025
Audrey Nicoll
Mr Kerr is going to pass, so I will bring in Ben Macpherson.
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 29 January 2025
Audrey Nicoll
Welcome back, everyone. We now move on to our second panel of witnesses. I am pleased to welcome Professor John Devaney from the University of Edinburgh; Professor Neil Websdale, director of the family violence centre at Arizona State University, who is joining us remotely鈥攁 warm welcome to you, Professor Websdale; I hope that you can hear us loud and clear; and Dr Grace Boughton, criminologist. Thank you all for attending today鈥檚 meeting. I apologise for the slight overrunning of the first panel.
I thank Professor Devaney and Dr Boughton for their submissions, which have been circulated ahead of today鈥檚 meeting. I particularly thank Dr Boughton, as she has travelled from England to join us this morning. As I said, Professor Websdale is joining us from Arizona, where it is maybe 4 am or 5 am鈥攊f he disappears for another cup of strong coffee, we will understand why. Thank you all for coming.
I will allow up to 75 minutes for questions. Before we start, I propose to members that, in order to allow enough time for this session, if required, we will defer our private session, which is a review of today鈥檚 evidence. We will see how the timing goes.
I start with a general opening question on part 2 of the bill, which sets out a framework for a system of domestic homicide and suicide reviews. I hope that John Devaney and Grace Boughton were able to listen to some of the evidence that we took earlier on part 2. I will come to John first, followed by Grace; then I will bring in Neil Websdale.
What are your general views on the principle in part 2 of having a statutory system of reviews in this area?
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 29 January 2025
Audrey Nicoll
Thank you. Rona Mackay, did you want to come in to follow up on definitions?
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 29 January 2025
Audrey Nicoll
I have two final requests to ask brief questions, to which, I hope, we will get succinct answers. I will bring in Liam Kerr and then Pauline McNeill.