The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of 成人快手 and committees will automatically update to show only the 成人快手 and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of 成人快手 and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of 成人快手 and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 3500 contributions
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 19 February 2025
Audrey Nicoll
Thank you. I note the provisions in the bill that say that a case review panel could be instructed to carry out its review in conjunction with another form of review. That is reassuring.
I am conscious of time, so I will bring in Fulton MacGregor. We will then move on to part 1.
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 19 February 2025
Audrey Nicoll
I will now move us on to part 1. I will go first to Liam Kerr鈥攐nce he is ready鈥攁nd I will then bring in Pauline McNeill.
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 19 February 2025
Audrey Nicoll
A couple of members still have questions, but I just want to ask about digital productions and the authentication of electronic copy documents. In relation to digital productions, some concerns have been expressed that the original physical item鈥攖he physical production鈥攎ight be disposed of before the potential evidence benefits of retaining it have been fully explored. What work is being done on a retention and disposal policy? Given some of the evidence that we have heard, might there be scope to make the position clearer in the bill?
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 19 February 2025
Audrey Nicoll
We have a bit to get through, so I am keen to encourage succinct questions and answers鈥擨 should have asked for that earlier. I will bring in Pauline McNeill.
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 19 February 2025
Audrey Nicoll
Thank you very much, cabinet secretary. That is appreciated.
We will move on to part 2 of the bill. I will begin by asking a question about the proposed definition of domestic abuse. You have helpfully outlined why you have settled on the definition that is set out in the bill. However, as you have acknowledged, we heard a range of views on the proposed definition, including that it is too broad and is out of line with Scotland鈥檚 current definition. One recent witness, Dr Emma Forbes, described it as borrowing
鈥渢oo much from other jurisdictions when we should be setting our own path.鈥濃擺Official Report, Criminal Justice Committee, 29 January 2025; c 27.]
Could you add a little more detail on the thinking behind the range of situations that might be subject to a domestic homicide or suicide review?
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 19 February 2025
Audrey Nicoll
We have time for a couple of final questions. I will come in first with a question on existing systems of review and the potential for crossover and then I will bring in Fulton MacGregor.
The committee has received evidence that raised concerns about adding a new system, or a new layer, of reviews to an already complex review landscape. There were also suggestions that a bit more could be done in existing systems of review to incorporate or align with the bill鈥檚 proposals. Has any consideration been given to ensuring that the various review processes are aligned and that organisations will not be overwhelmed by their competing demands?
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 19 February 2025
Audrey Nicoll
Thank you very much. As members have no further questions, I will draw our session to a close, and I thank the cabinet secretary and her team for their attendance.
We look forward to the cabinet secretary joining us again next week, when we will hear a wee bit more about her proposals for amendments to the Victims, Witnesses, and Justice Reform (Scotland) Bill at stage 2.
11:33 Meeting continued in private until 12:51.Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 19 February 2025
Audrey Nicoll
Good morning, and welcome to the sixth meeting in 2025 of the Criminal Justice Committee. We have received no apologies. Katy Clark will be joining us shortly.
Our main item of business is to continue our stage 1 scrutiny of the Criminal Justice Modernisation and Abusive Domestic Behaviour Reviews (Scotland) Bill. I am very pleased that we are joined by Angela Constance, the Cabinet Secretary for Justice and Home Affairs; Vallath Kavitha Krishnan, the bill team leader in the criminal justice reform unit; Vicky Carmichael, the team leader of the violence against women and girls justice unit; and Louise Miller, a solicitor in the Scottish Government legal directorate. Thank you very much for joining us.
I refer members to papers 1 and 2. I intend to allow up to 90 minutes for the session.
I invite the cabinet secretary to make some opening remarks.
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 19 February 2025
Audrey Nicoll
The final question will be asked by Fulton MacGregor.
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 19 February 2025
Audrey Nicoll
Thank you very much. I am conscious of time, so I will move on to other members.