The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of ³ÉÈË¿ìÊÖ and committees will automatically update to show only the ³ÉÈË¿ìÊÖ and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of ³ÉÈË¿ìÊÖ and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of ³ÉÈË¿ìÊÖ and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 3500 contributions
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 15 September 2021
Audrey Nicoll
The next item is formal consideration of the motions to approve the two affirmative instruments. I invite the minister to move the motions.
Motions moved,
That the Criminal Justice Committee recommends that the Conference of the Parties to the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (Immunities and Privileges) (Scotland) Order 2021 [draft] be approved.
That the Criminal Justice Committee recommends that the European Union and European Atomic Energy Community (Immunities and Privileges) (Scotland) Order 2021 [draft] be approved.—[Ash Denham]
Motions agreed to.
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 15 September 2021
Audrey Nicoll
I invite the committee to delegate to me the publication of a short factual report on our deliberations on the affirmative Scottish statutory instruments that we have considered today. Are we agreed?
Members indicated agreement.
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 15 September 2021
Audrey Nicoll
Our next agenda item is a round-table discussion about prisons and prison policy. I refer members to papers 3 and 4. We will take evidence today from a round table of witnesses, who will be joining us virtually. I am sorry that you cannot join us in person, which is due to the current rules on social distancing.
I welcome our panel of witnesses. Alan Staff is the chief executive of Apex Scotland; Mr Bruce Adamson is the Children and Young People’s Commissioner Scotland; Wendy Sinclair-Gieben is Her Majesty’s chief inspector of prisons for Scotland; Dr Katrina Morrison is committee secretary of the Howard League Scotland; John Watt is the chair of the Parole Board for Scotland; Mr Phil Fairlie is the assistant general secretary of the Prison Officers Association Scotland; Professor Fergus McNeill is a professor of criminology and social work at the University of Glasgow’s Scottish centre for crime and justice research; Ms Teresa Medhurst is the interim chief executive of the Scottish Prison Service; and Allister Purdie is the Prison Service’s interim director of operations. We very much appreciate your taking the time to join us this morning. I thank witnesses who have provided written submissions, which are now available online.
I intend to allow around an hour and 15 minutes for questions and discussion. I ask members to indicate to which witness they are directing their remarks. We can then open the floor to other witnesses for their comments. If other witnesses wish to respond, I ask them to indicate that by typing R in the chat function in BlueJeans. I will bring you in, if time permits. If you agree with what another witness is saying, there is no need for you to intervene. Other comments that you make in the chat function will not be visible to committee members or recorded anywhere, so if you want to make a comment, please do so by requesting to speak.
We will move directly to questions. I ask members and our invited guests to keep their questions and comments as succinct as possible. I am keen to encourage a free-flowing discussion.
I start by inviting Ms Pauline McNeill to ask some questions. I will then bring in Rona Mackay.
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 15 September 2021
Audrey Nicoll
I believe that Alan Staff would like to respond, too.
10:30Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 15 September 2021
Audrey Nicoll
I think that Mr Adamson is also quite keen to say a few words on the subject.
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 15 September 2021
Audrey Nicoll
I ask you to be as brief as you can, Mr Watt. I will then bring this evidence session to a close.
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 15 September 2021
Audrey Nicoll
I know that we probably did not get through a lot of the questions and responses that we would have liked to, so I extend an invitation to the witnesses: if you wish to raise any outstanding points with the committee, please feel free to contact us in writing, and we will very much take your evidence into account.
I extend my thanks to all our witnesses today. Thank you very much for your contributions. We will now take a short break before we hear from our next set of witnesses.
11:47 Meeting suspended.Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 15 September 2021
Audrey Nicoll
I have a follow-up question for Ms Fraser and Ms Dyer. How can the important principle of judicial independence be implemented throughout Scotland instead of only in a few areas or sheriffdoms? As we have seen from Audit Scotland’s work, sentencing data show some geographical variation in the use of community sentences. For example, in 2019-20, the number of community payback orders per 10,000 of the population ranged from 16 in East Renfrewshire to 69 in Clackmannanshire. Do you have any comments on or response to that?
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 15 September 2021
Audrey Nicoll
Do you have any further questions, Mr Greene?
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 15 September 2021
Audrey Nicoll
If there are no more questions on that topic, I am keen to move on to alternatives to custody and diversion from prosecution, before we go on to community sentencing.