The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of 成人快手 and committees will automatically update to show only the 成人快手 and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of 成人快手 and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of 成人快手 and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 3500 contributions
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 8 December 2021
Audrey Nicoll
Good morning and welcome to the 13th meeting of the Criminal Justice Committee in 2021. We have apologies from Russell Findlay. Fulton MacGregor joins us online.
Our first item of business is to agree whether to take agenda item 3, which is consideration of this morning鈥檚 evidence, in private. Are we agreed to take item 3 in private?
Members indicated agreement.
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 8 December 2021
Audrey Nicoll
We are certainly aware of trauma-informed approaches. That issue has been raised and members may come back to it later.
Another key issue is communication and engagement with witnesses, by which I mean survivors and complainers. There has been some commentary about and criticism of that issue. There has been a suggestion that there should be a single point of contact鈥攕omeone who could advocate for an individual and chaperone them through the process. Has there been any consideration of that?
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 8 December 2021
Audrey Nicoll
I have a question about the timescales for working through the proposed changes, in particular in relation to your work with justice partners in establishing a specialist court. Forgive me鈥攅arlier, I conflated domestic abuse courts and specialist courts when I was referring to specialist courts.
How long do you anticipate that that process might take?
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 8 December 2021
Audrey Nicoll
I will bring in Jamie Greene, to be followed by Collette Stevenson.
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 8 December 2021
Audrey Nicoll
I am aware that Fulton MacGregor has not yet come in. I will bring him in shortly, but Rona Mackay and Pauline McNeill are keen to pick up on some points.
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 8 December 2021
Audrey Nicoll
I have a final question on the subject of court processes. Are special measures and videolink evidence available in all High Court and sheriff court cases? If not, could consideration of that be taken into account when you are deciding whether to move a case from the High Court to a sheriff court? Does taking evidence by videolink have cost implications, and would that be an issue?
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 8 December 2021
Audrey Nicoll
I will move on to Jamie Greene, who has some questions about environmental issues.
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 8 December 2021
Audrey Nicoll
Katy Clark has some questions on specialist courts.
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 8 December 2021
Audrey Nicoll
We will pick up on that after questions from Rona Mackay.
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 8 December 2021
Audrey Nicoll
Members will be aware that we are coming to the end of the current 16 days of activism against gender-based violence. Our next item is consideration of evidence on efforts to improve the ways in which we prosecute violence against women and girls and to support survivors of such crimes. I refer members to papers 1 to 4.
The committee is carrying out this work to shine a light on an important subject. This is the first of three evidence sessions. In later weeks, we will hear from Police Scotland, the Cabinet Secretary for Justice and Veterans and the Lord Advocate. We want to know what our police service, courts, prosecution service and Government are doing to tackle violence against women and girls.
I welcome two senior representatives of the Scottish Courts and Tribunals Service: David Fraser, executive director of court operations; and Danielle McLaughlin, head of implementation of the Lord Justice Clerk鈥檚 review.
I thank all the people we have spoken to about this subject. We recognise that it takes immense courage to talk about this and I pay tribute to everyone who has done so. It really helps to inform our views. I also thank Danielle and David for joining us today. I expect the session to last for 60 to 90 minutes. I make my usual plea for succinct questions and answers.
I will open the questioning. As we are aware, Lady Dorrian鈥檚 review of the management of sexual offence cases was published earlier in the year. Given that we are nearly a year on from its publication, I would like to begin with a general question about the progress that has been made on the recommendations that were made in that report. What steps are being taken to implement some of the recommendations?