The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of ˿ and committees will automatically update to show only the ˿ and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of ˿ and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of ˿ and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 3500 contributions
Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 11 June 2025
Audrey Nicoll
As no other members wish to come in, I invite the cabinet secretary to speak.
Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 11 June 2025
Audrey Nicoll
The next group is entitled, “Part 2 reviews: notification to next of kin”. Amendment 77, in the name of Sharon Dowey, is grouped with amendment 92.
Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 11 June 2025
Audrey Nicoll
Our next group is entitled “Part 2 reviews: case reports”. Amendment 27, in the name of the cabinet secretary, is grouped with amendments 28, 29, 31 and 32. Due to pre-emption, if amendment 31 is agreed to, I cannot call amendment 91, which is in the group entitled “Part 2 reviews: familial homicide and honour killing”. I call the cabinet secretary to move amendment 27 and speak to all amendments in the group.
Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 11 June 2025
Audrey Nicoll
Our next group is entitled “Part 2 reviews: link to domestic abuse”. Amendment 14, in the name of the cabinet secretary, is grouped with amendments 15, 17 and 18. I call the cabinet secretary to move amendment 14 and speak to all the amendments in the group.
Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 11 June 2025
Audrey Nicoll
I call Pauline McNeill to wind up, and to indicate whether she wishes to press or withdraw amendment 34.
Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 11 June 2025
Audrey Nicoll
I call Sharon Dowey to press or withdraw amendment 77.
Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 11 June 2025
Audrey Nicoll
I call amendment 31, in the name of the cabinet secretary. I remind members that, if amendment 31 is agreed to, I cannot call amendment 91, due to pre-emption.
Amendments 31 and 32 moved—[Angela Constance]—and agreed to.
Amendment 92 not moved.
Section 26, as amended, agreed to.
Sections 27 to 29 agreed to.
Long title agreed to.
Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 11 June 2025
Audrey Nicoll
That ends stage 2 consideration of the bill. I thank everyone for the constructive way in which they have engaged with the debate and our collective endeavours. I thank the cabinet secretary and all her officials for their contributions.
We will not meet next week, as the committee will be visiting HMP Edinburgh as part of our inquiry into reducing harm from substance misuse in Scottish prisons.
Meeting closed at 12:45.Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 11 June 2025
Audrey Nicoll
The question is, that amendment 50 be agreed to. Are we agreed?
Members: No.
Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 11 June 2025
Audrey Nicoll
I refer back to some of the cabinet secretary’s comments with regard to circumstances in which a court can find itself, given the huge range of types of productions that can be relevant to a case. I acknowledge that some productions can be perishable. One example is contaminated clothing, and I think that marijuana was an example that the cabinet secretary gave.
In addition, we should consider that trauma can be caused where, for example, a mobile phone that has significant evidence on it is required to be retained as a production. That in itself can be quite traumatising for a victim, in particular. Huge and significantly bulky items such as a car or a sofa, or anything like that, can also be required as evidence.
I just want to flag up those points to Pauline McNeill.