The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of łÉČËżěĘÖ and committees will automatically update to show only the łÉČËżěĘÖ and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of łÉČËżěĘÖ and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of łÉČËżěĘÖ and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 3500 contributions
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 25 May 2022
Audrey Nicoll
Can you confirm whether you will press amendment 67?
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 25 May 2022
Audrey Nicoll
Amendment 1, in the name of Pauline McNeill, is grouped with amendment 69.
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 25 May 2022
Audrey Nicoll
We move to group 8. Amendment 70, in the name of Russell Findlay, is grouped with amendments 71, 15, 72 to 74 and 77.
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 25 May 2022
Audrey Nicoll
The question is, that amendment 70 be agreed to. Are we agreed?
Members: No.
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 25 May 2022
Audrey Nicoll
The result of the division is: For 4, Against 4, Abstentions 0. There is an equality of votes. Therefore, as convener, I shall use my casting vote to vote against the amendment.
Amendment 70 disagreed to.
Amendment 71 moved—[Russell Findlay].
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 25 May 2022
Audrey Nicoll
The result of the division is: For 4, Against 4, Abstentions 0. There is an equality of votes. Therefore, as convener, I will use my casting vote against the amendment.
Amendment 76 disagreed to.
Amendment 17 moved—[Ash Regan]—and agreed to.
Amendment 77 not moved.
Section 9, as amended, agreed to.
Section 10—Grant of fireworks licence subject to conditions
Amendment 78 not moved.
Amendment 18 moved—[Ash Regan]—and agreed to.
Amendments 79 and 80 not moved.
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 25 May 2022
Audrey Nicoll
We will pause stage 2 proceedings at that point and resume consideration of amendments to the rest of the bill at our next meeting, on Wednesday 1 June. We will also consider several affirmative instruments at our meeting next week. Those will include criminal justice regulations relating to offences, as well as regulations on legal aid.
I thank the minister and her team for attending.
Meeting closed at 12:58.Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 18 May 2022
Audrey Nicoll
I would like to go back to the discussion at the start, when the convener picked up on the issue of resources. The committee considered that issue previously during a session with Police Scotland and the NCA—Miles Bonfield, you were involved in that—and we also considered it in our pre-budget scrutiny.
I recognise that part of the overall response to child sexual exploitation online involves enforcement, and that we need to have a skilled body that can undertake that investigative role, given the international and underground dimensions of the issue, but I am still not clear what the committee and the Scottish Government need to be thinking about in terms of resources. On recruitment, what skills do we need to bring in so that we can fill the skills gap and ensure that we have an adequate investigative capability? How do we make Police Scotland an employer of choice—rather than, say, Google—for the people with the skills that we need in the workplace?
Miles Bonfield, could you respond to that first?
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 18 May 2022
Audrey Nicoll
I endorse colleagues’ points about the value of the visit. I have to be honest and say that I did not know much about the Wise Group’s work before the visit, and I learned an awful lot, particularly about its throughcare provision.
I am interested in learning a little more about the wider reach of the Wise Group across Scotland. For instance, I am interested in what work it is doing or planning up here in the north-east. Obviously, we have HMP Grampian near my constituency. I would find it helpful to have a bit of background on that wider work.
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 18 May 2022
Audrey Nicoll
I want to ask a quick follow-up question. I am happy to go back to Inga Heyman and ACC Hawkins. We know that, if officers use the provisions in section 297, they can take someone to a place of safety, and they are often turned away for lots of different reasons that we know about. That can be for very legitimate reasons. Essentially, they are left holding the baby. I know that you are working on that and that there is progress across Scotland on pathways. Bearing in mind the challenges of remote and rural areas, what should we be thinking about as the optimum pathway in local areas?