The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of 成人快手 and committees will automatically update to show only the 成人快手 and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of 成人快手 and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of 成人快手 and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 3579 contributions
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 21 December 2022
Audrey Nicoll
We are at 10 past 11, but I am happy to bring in Katy Clark if things are kept as succinct as possible.
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 21 December 2022
Audrey Nicoll
In the spirit of our coming up to the festive season, I will allow Fulton MacGregor to come in with a final quick question. We will then need to bring the session to a close.
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 21 December 2022
Audrey Nicoll
I am happy for the minister to respond to the question, but I am keen to keep questions on track. We were asking about the potential transfer of justice social work into the national care service.
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 21 December 2022
Audrey Nicoll
I will bring in Pauline McNeill, followed by Collette Stevenson. I remind members that we are coming up to five minutes to the hour. I am happy to extend the session to around 10 past 11, but we have four members to come in, so I ask for questions and answers to be fairly succinct.
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 21 December 2022
Audrey Nicoll
That is fine. Your points were all relevant.
We have 20 to 25 minutes left. I will bring in Russell Findlay to be followed by Jamie Greene.
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 21 December 2022
Audrey Nicoll
Was that a question or a comment?
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 21 December 2022
Audrey Nicoll
We heard from the cabinet secretary on the legislative consent memorandum, in which the Scottish Government recommends that the Scottish Parliament should not consent to the relevant provisions in the bill as set out in the draft motion. Our role today is to consider the content of the memorandum and to decide whether we agree to not consent or otherwise.
At this stage, I want to open things up to members for queries, comments or questions. I will then formally ask the question on the LCM.
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 21 December 2022
Audrey Nicoll
That is fine.
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 21 December 2022
Audrey Nicoll
Are members content to delegate to me the publication of the report that summarises the outcome of our deliberations on the LCM?
Members indicated agreement.
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 21 December 2022
Audrey Nicoll
Thank you, members鈥攖hat has been helpful.
I will add a few personal comments. Jamie Greene talked about the correspondence between the Lord Advocate and the secretary of state. The Lord Advocate鈥檚 most recent correspondence was on 10 October, when she wrote to the new Northern Ireland secretary and outlined suggestions on the bill. As far as I am aware, the Lord Advocate has not had any response to that. On that note, the bill is nearly complete and through its journey, so I am concerned that nothing has come back from the UK Government in response to the Lord Advocate鈥檚 correspondence.
Secondly, I want to point out some comments from the Council of Europe Commissioner for Human Rights that the bill runs the risk of being found to be non-compliant with human rights. Indeed, the Northern Ireland Human Rights Commission also expressed grave concerns about the bill and its incompatibility with the Good Friday agreement. The cabinet secretary alluded to that in his statement when he joined us a couple of weeks ago.
Finally, I am uncomfortable with the notion that the ICRIR would have a role in Scotland that could impact on people鈥檚 access to justice, whatever that might be. I am also uncomfortable with the notion that the role and function of the Lord Advocate could be affected.
Does the committee agree with the Scottish Government that the Scottish Parliament should not consent to the relevant provisions in the bill as they have been set out in the Scottish Government鈥檚 draft motion?
It is probably best to go round the table and let members indicate their position.
For
Clark, Katy (West Scotland) (Lab)
MacGregor, Fulton (Coatbridge and Chryston) (SNP)
Mackay, Rona (Strathkelvin and Bearsden) (SNP)
McNeill, Pauline (Glasgow) (Lab)
Nicoll, Audrey (Aberdeen South and North Kincardine) (SNP)
Stevenson, Collette (East Kilbride) (SNP)
Against
Findlay, Russell (West Scotland) (Con)
Greene, Jamie (West Scotland) (Con)