The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of 成人快手 and committees will automatically update to show only the 成人快手 and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of 成人快手 and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of 成人快手 and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 3500 contributions
Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 11 January 2023
Audrey Nicoll
Does Russell Findlay want to come back in?
Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 11 January 2023
Audrey Nicoll
Thank you. That completes our public business.
13:03 Meeting continued in private until 13:04.Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 11 January 2023
Audrey Nicoll
Emma Bryson, would you like to come in on that?
Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 11 January 2023
Audrey Nicoll
I will follow up on some of Collette Stevenson鈥檚 questions and ask about communication with victims.
The witnesses might be aware that the committee had a private meeting with survivors. One thing that came through to me loud and clear from that was the mixed picture that exists in relation to contact and communication between, in particular, the courts and a victim while a case is being processed to make clear to the victim what is happening and enable them to plan their and their family鈥檚 life around it.
What opportunity might the bill provide on that? We are focusing on bail, remand, throughcare and release, but a key part of that work is communication with victims. Is there an opportunity for the bill to improve the lines of communication? If so, how would you like them to be improved?
Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 11 January 2023
Audrey Nicoll
That is helpful; we appreciate that.
Do any other members have questions?
Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 11 January 2023
Audrey Nicoll
I will bring in Fulton MacGregor and then Collette Stevenson, Russell Findlay and Rona Mackay.
Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 11 January 2023
Audrey Nicoll
The next agenda item is to consider correspondence from the Cabinet Secretary for Justice and Veterans on virtual trials and the current practice of charging for court transcripts. I refer members to paper 5. I thank the cabinet secretary for his letter.
First, I remind members that the committee recognises that the use of virtual trials is already provided for in the Coronavirus (Recovery and Reform) (Scotland) Act 2022. However, despite that and the practice note that was issued by the Lord Justice General, very few fully virtual trials have been held. The committee has been keen to see more take place, particularly for cases involving rape and other serious sexual offences. The question remains of how we can see more of such trials in order to build up an evidence base to inform whether they could become an option for prosecution of appropriate sexual offences cases.
Secondly, on the issue of the current practice of charging for court transcripts, I welcome the cabinet secretary鈥檚 comments, and I note his support in principle. However, in his correspondence, he refers to the possibility that further consultation might be required. Members will recall that we have written to the cabinet secretary on the issue, because we are keen that it is considered prior to the introduction of the forthcoming criminal justice reform bill to enable us to consider such a provision as part of the scrutiny of that bill, which could provide a suitable legislative opportunity to resolve the issue.
There is quite a bit in there. Do members wish to make any comments on virtual trials?
Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 11 January 2023
Audrey Nicoll
The next agenda item is consideration of an update to our action plan. This item was delayed from our previous meeting. In the spirit of saving time, rather than considering the action plan page by page today, I ask members whether they are happy to let the clerking team know if they have any queries about, or additions or amendments to, the action plan. We can come back to the action plan at a future meeting. Do members agree to that?
Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 11 January 2023
Audrey Nicoll
To follow on from those responses, I note that a key part of the decision-making process is the information that is provided to the court, on which decisions are based. The provisions in the bill put criminal justice social work front and centre of that process. In their detailed submission, Hannah Graham and Fergus McNeill articulate their views on other contributions to the bail decision-making process and elsewhere鈥攆or example, on release from custody and in the third sector.
I will come back to Lesley McAra and then bring in Hannah Graham and Fergus McNeill. Perhaps you could outline your thoughts on the proposals specifically as they apply to criminal justice social work, and your feelings on the practicalities around resourcing, for example, which we hear about time and time again.
Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 11 January 2023
Audrey Nicoll
I agree.
I agree with what members said about court transcripts. I suggest that we should clarify with the cabinet secretary whether there is a plan to undertake a consultation on the proposals in advance of the introduction of the criminal justice law reform bill, or whether his letter refers to the fact that that might be done at some future point. There is a lack of clarity about timescales, so I am keen that we get more detail about that.
Are members happy with that approach?
Members indicated agreement.