The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of ³ÉÈË¿ìÊÖ and committees will automatically update to show only the ³ÉÈË¿ìÊÖ and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of ³ÉÈË¿ìÊÖ and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of ³ÉÈË¿ìÊÖ and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 3500 contributions
Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 11 January 2023
Audrey Nicoll
I hand over to Russell Findlay, and then I will bring in Rona Mackay.
Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 11 January 2023
Audrey Nicoll
Thank you for raising that point. I am happy with the question and I was happy to give Dr Graham a chance to respond. I do not intend to take any more questions relating to political views. I would like the session to come back to the bill. On that note, we will hear from Rona Mackay.
Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 11 January 2023
Audrey Nicoll
That is fine.
I concur with the views that have been expressed. It would be helpful for us to seek up-to-date data from the SCTS on the number of fully virtual trials that have taken place since we got the previous figures almost a year ago, when we were looking at the coronavirus legislation. I am happy to take that forward on members’ behalf.
In relation to the concerns about the role of defence agents in opposing virtual trials, there might be an opportunity for us to ask the Lord Justice Clerk why, despite the practice note that they issued, the practical reality is that very few such trials seem to be taking place.
Finally, in relation to the comments that were made about the cabinet secretary, I wonder whether members would agree that we should ask him to refer to the justice board and the governance group that is overseeing Lady Dorrian’s report to get more clarity on why there are still very few virtual trials, despite the fact that there is provision for them.
Do members agree that I should take those tasks away?
Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 11 January 2023
Audrey Nicoll
Thanks very much. Before I hand over to other members, I will pick up on the risk assessment process that Kate Wallace outlined and which Victim Support Scotland wants to see as part of the consideration process. The proposal in the bill is that criminal justice social work would have a big role in informing bail decisions.
I am interested in your views on who else or which other organisations it would be appropriate to have participate in the process, particularly given the concerns that you have outlined for victims and the importance of their voices being heard in that decision-making process.
Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 11 January 2023
Audrey Nicoll
That is helpful. Different modes of communication is something that I had not thought about, but I absolutely understand the value of that. Does Emma Bryson want to come in on any of that?
Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 11 January 2023
Audrey Nicoll
Yes, I am content with that.
Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 11 January 2023
Audrey Nicoll
That is the back of 11 o’clock, so we will draw the evidence session to a close. I thank Kate Wallace and Emma Bryson for their contribution.
We will have a short suspension to allow the witnesses to leave.
11:08 Meeting suspended.Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 11 January 2023
Audrey Nicoll
The next agenda item is consideration of legislative consent issues with regard to the United Kingdom Government’s Public Order Bill. I refer members to paper 3. You will see that the relevant provision in the bill is to extend powers similar to those currently held by Police Scotland to British Transport Police in Scotland for the policing of protests on railway land. The Scottish Government recommends that legislative consent be given to that provision.
I am happy to open the discussion to members now, and we will then consider what recommendation we want to make to Parliament on legislative consent. Do members have any queries or questions?
As there are none, the question is whether the committee agrees with the Scottish Government that the Scottish Parliament should consent to the relevant provisions in the bill as set out in the Scottish Government’s draft motion. Are members happy with that?
Members indicated agreement.
Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 11 January 2023
Audrey Nicoll
I will bring in Katy Clark and then Jamie Greene. We will run the meeting for as long as we need to, but it would be helpful if questions and answers could be succinct.
Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 11 January 2023
Audrey Nicoll
Are members content to delegate to me the publication of a short report that summarises the outcome of our deliberations on the legislative consent memorandum?
Members indicated agreement.