The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of ³ÉÈË¿ìÊÖ and committees will automatically update to show only the ³ÉÈË¿ìÊÖ and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of ³ÉÈË¿ìÊÖ and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of ³ÉÈË¿ìÊÖ and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 3579 contributions
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 22 February 2023
Audrey Nicoll
Thanks. That is noted.
We will move through the action plan. We are on page 10.
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 22 February 2023
Audrey Nicoll
On that note, I bring the session to a close. I thank all our witnesses for attending the meeting.
There will be a short suspension to allow for a changeover of officials.
10:13 Meeting suspended.Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 22 February 2023
Audrey Nicoll
Perhaps we will just pause for a moment.
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 22 February 2023
Audrey Nicoll
I am happy with that suggestion.
I ask members for an indication of their view on going back to Police Scotland to ask some further questions. Rona, I know that you—[Interruption.] Do members agree that we should do that?
Members indicated agreement.
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 22 February 2023
Audrey Nicoll
I will bring in Stephen Imrie in case I have missed anything; I do not think that I have.
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 22 February 2023
Audrey Nicoll
I thank the witnesses for attending this morning. We will pause momentarily to allow the cabinet secretary to leave.
10:53 Meeting suspended.Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 22 February 2023
Audrey Nicoll
I am happy for us to incorporate that into correspondence to the cabinet secretary. Obviously, the criminal justice reform bill is coming forward, and I would be very surprised if the new contract and the process around that were not incorporated into the bill.
Are members happy with what we have proposed?
Members indicated agreement.
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 22 February 2023
Audrey Nicoll
I will pull things together. Very few such trials have been undertaken despite the support for the notion of virtual trials, and members have highlighted some relevant points. We need a much more substantial evidence base. It is concerning that momentum is waning, if that is the case. The fact is that the reality seems to be at odds with what is happening in our court system.
There are good points to raise about budget implications for virtual trials. Issues such as the quality of connections are practical matters, but they are important nonetheless. It is good to see better use of a virtual option for taking evidence on commission; that was highlighted in some of the correspondence that we received.
For next steps, I propose—I am not sure whether all members will agree with this—that we note the discussion that we have had today and note that the matter will be the subject of further consideration in the forthcoming criminal justice reform bill. However, Jamie Greene’s last comments suggest that he would prefer to go back to the SCTS with some further questions.
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 22 February 2023
Audrey Nicoll
Thanks, Jamie. I am happy to look at an opportunity to do that.
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 22 February 2023
Audrey Nicoll
On the point about monitoring the remand population, your impression is probably correct. I am certainly happy to consider some work around monitoring remand populations outwith the scope of the work on the Bail and Release from Custody (Scotland) Bill, which will conclude shortly. I am happy to consider that point further, because it is clearly a pressing issue that we have been grappling with.