The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of ˿ and committees will automatically update to show only the ˿ and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of ˿ and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of ˿ and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 3500 contributions
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 8 February 2023
Audrey Nicoll
Yes.
We will pull the discussion to a close in a moment but, to go back to the Prison Service, we can ask for some detail on the £97 million spend, which is set out as the capital budget for modernisation, taking into account the comments that Katy Clark and others have made.
Are members happy with that follow-up?
Members indicated agreement.
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 8 February 2023
Audrey Nicoll
That is fine. Thank you very much.
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 8 February 2023
Audrey Nicoll
Our next agenda item is consideration of a negative instrument: the Parole Board (Scotland) Rules 2022. I refer members to paper 2. Do members have any questions on the instrument?
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 8 February 2023
Audrey Nicoll
Thank you very much. That concludes the public part of our meeting, and we will move into private after a short comfort break.
10:55 Meeting continued in private until 12:47.Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 8 February 2023
Audrey Nicoll
Thanks, Jamie. I will come back to the issue of the wording in the cabinet secretary’s response to our report. Rona Mackay has her hand up, so I will go to her first.
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 8 February 2023
Audrey Nicoll
While we are on the subject, my interpretation of the comments that the cabinet secretary made in his reply, which are at the bottom of page 3 of paper 1 and go into page 4, is that it is more about the interpretation of the wording that was recorded in the Official Report of that meeting, which is replicated in our budget scrutiny report. What he said is reflected accurately in both of those documents—the Official Report and our budget scrutiny report. However, he referred to the fact that, in paragraph 77 of our report, we paraphrased what he said—as Jamie Greene has noted. My view is that there was no intention to mislead in regard to the exact phrase that he used or to misrepresent what he said in committee. However, it seems to have resulted in him feeling that it was necessary for him to highlight what he felt might be interpreted as an inaccurate account of what he said. It was my intention to raise that with members.
Jamie, you have set out your views on the wider issue of the police budget. Pauline McNeill, would you like to come in on that point?
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 8 February 2023
Audrey Nicoll
My interpretation of the cabinet secretary raising the issue is that, as Rona Mackay said, it is ultimately an operational decision for the chief constable to make. The cabinet secretary said in the evidence session that he had
“no intention of overseeing a budget for the police force that results in 4,000 officers leaving.”
The concern that the cabinet secretary raises is that the paraphrasing of that statement misrepresents what he said. I do not want to get caught up in the minutiae of what is in our report by way of a paraphrase set against what he actually said. If there are still questions on the budget, I am happy for us to go back to the cabinet secretary with those questions, because it is an important issue.
Stephen Imrie, do you want to come in with anything over and above that?
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 8 February 2023
Audrey Nicoll
Quite a range of issues were covered there. Are there specific points that you would like the committee to go back to the cabinet secretary on, or did you just want to put those points on the record?
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 8 February 2023
Audrey Nicoll
On the issues that Russell Findlay raised about the Scottish Prison Service, I am happy to write back with further requests for clarification. The point about private sector contract costs and some of the challenges that are linked to inflation and increasing prices is reasonable, because that is having a significant impact. I am happy to write about the other points that Russell Findlay raised about HMP Addiewell and HMP Kilmarnock.
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 8 February 2023
Audrey Nicoll
With regard to the SPA budget, I note the information that has been provided regarding the figure that has been allocated for
“police assets including the estate, fleet and technology”,
as Russell Findlay has just outlined.
The committee has been interested in body-worn cameras for quite some time, and we received an update from the cabinet secretary—I would not care to guess when exactly that was, but it was fairly recently. Again, that is an operational decision for the chief constable, but there is general support for such cameras to be introduced and rolled out. I do not think that there has been any further update on that, has there?