The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of 成人快手 and committees will automatically update to show only the 成人快手 and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of 成人快手 and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of 成人快手 and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 3500 contributions
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 8 March 2023
Audrey Nicoll
Thanks very much. I will come to Professor Burman, then I will bring in our other two witnesses.
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 8 March 2023
Audrey Nicoll
Thanks very much for that. I will bring in Dr Marsha Scott next, and then Amanda Masson.
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 8 March 2023
Audrey Nicoll
Dr Scott, I know that you might have to leave us, so feel free to just log off when you need to.
I now bring in Fulton MacGregor.
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 8 March 2023
Audrey Nicoll
I will bring in Craig Naylor on training and, in particular, timescales in light of some of the work that HMICS has already done on the issue.
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 8 March 2023
Audrey Nicoll
I will bring in Pauline McNeill and then Fulton MacGregor.
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 8 March 2023
Audrey Nicoll
Both the witnesses who are online want to come in. I ask for fairly succinct answers, so that everyone can get the opportunity to ask questions.
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 1 March 2023
Audrey Nicoll
Our first and main item of business is to consider the criminal justice issues raised in the Scottish Mental Health Law Review. As members will recall, the Scottish Government established the review to examine existing Scots law, with a view to improving the rights and protections of people who might be subject to mental health, incapacity or adult protection legislation by virtue of having a mental disorder.
We are joined by Professor Colin McKay. Professor McKay, who is based at the centre for mental health and capacity law at Edinburgh Napier University, was a member of the Scottish Mental Health Law Review team. Welcome.
I refer members to papers 1 and 2. I intend to allow around 45 minutes for this session. I invite Professor McKay to make some brief opening remarks.
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 1 March 2023
Audrey Nicoll
That has brought us nice and neatly to our 45 minutes. Thank you very much indeed, Professor McKay, for attending today鈥檚 meeting. Members might have some follow-up questions, and we will write to you with them.
10:16 Meeting suspended.Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 1 March 2023
Audrey Nicoll
Thank you, Professor McKay. That has been a very helpful overview.
We move straight to questions. I will kick things off with a question about section 297 of the Mental Health (Care and Treatment) (Scotland) Act 2003, which deals with an issue that I have been interested in for a number of years. That makes provision for an officer to take a person from a public place to a 鈥減lace of safety鈥. The review highlights that much police time is spent dealing with such issues. You referred to the fact that, in May last year, the committee took evidence on that issue. You will know that many people who are in distress are in their homes and therefore in a private place.
The review report outlines a range of issues. That includes noting that the police are not best placed to respond to those situations and that the provisions of the 2003 act are being used to respond to people who are in distress, rather than those who are experiencing acute mental illness, as section 297 of the act refers to.
We note that your review makes some recommendations about that. One recommendation in the report is that the Scottish Government should
鈥渨ork with health and care agencies to develop alternative places of safety for people who are in distress and at risk鈥,
and might not necessarily need psychiatric care.
Another recommendation is that the Government should
鈥渞eview whether the place of safety powers should extend beyond suspected mental or intellectual disability to other people who may be at serious risk.鈥
That is a rather long-winded introduction to asking you to outline a little more about the review鈥檚 work on that particular part of the 2003 act.
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 1 March 2023
Audrey Nicoll
We will come back to what those alternative options and places of safety could look like. I am conscious of the time, so I will bring in other members now and hand straight over to Russell Findlay.
09:45