The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of łÉČËżěĘÖ and committees will automatically update to show only the łÉČËżěĘÖ and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of łÉČËżěĘÖ and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of łÉČËżěĘÖ and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 3527 contributions
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 10 May 2023
Audrey Nicoll
The result of the division is: For 4, Against 4, Abstentions 0.
As there is an equality of votes, as convener, I use my casting vote to vote against the amendment.
Amendment 58 disagreed to.
Amendments 59, 30, 60 to 62, 32, 63, 64, 2, 33 and 34 not moved.
Section 2 agreed to.
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 10 May 2023
Audrey Nicoll
Does anyone else want to move it?
12:45Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 10 May 2023
Audrey Nicoll
Would any other member like to come in?
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 10 May 2023
Audrey Nicoll
Group 2 is on entitlement to bail. Amendment 55, in the name of Katy Clark, is grouped with amendments 56, 57, 31, 58, 59, 30, 60 to 62, 32, 63, 64, 2, 33 and 34.
I draw members’ attention to the procedural information relating to this group as set out in the groupings. If amendment 55 is agreed to, I will be unable to call amendments 56, 57, 31, 58, 59, 30, 60 to 62, 32, 63 and 64, because of pre-emption. Similarly, if amendment 2 is agreed to, I will be unable to call amendments 33 and 34, again due to pre-emption.
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 3 May 2023
Audrey Nicoll
Thank you, minister. We have had a good range of questions and responses. I will pick up on a couple of points before we move on. We would welcome any feedback that you can provide on charges arising from assaults on emergency workers. That would be helpful for the committee in keeping track of the situation.
Section 41 of the 2022 act gives a constable power to detain a person for the purposes of search, but it does not appear to cover a further ban on entry to a ground. Could you write to us on those entry issues and on whether it might be appropriate to have a ban on entry after someone has been found to be in possession of a pyrotechnic article?
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 3 May 2023
Audrey Nicoll
Are members content to delegate to me the responsibility for producing a short factual report detailing our consideration of the SSI?
Members indicated agreement.
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 3 May 2023
Audrey Nicoll
Our next agenda item is consideration of the negative instrument associated with the affirmative instrument that we have just considered. I refer members to paper 3.
As it seems that members have no additional questions, are we content to make no recommendation to the Parliament on the instrument?
Members indicated agreement.
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 3 May 2023
Audrey Nicoll
That is helpful. Just to follow up, I would like to know whether, once the provision is in place, in June, there will be a piece of work to monitor potential incidents in smaller venues and to respond accordingly if that is proving to be problematic. However, I appreciate your response.
I will open up the discussion to members.
09:45Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 3 May 2023
Audrey Nicoll
Thank you.
Minister, I invite you to move motion S6M-08408.
Motion moved,
That the Criminal Justice Committee recommends that the Fireworks and Pyrotechnic Articles (Scotland) Act 2022 (Consequential Modifications, Saving and Transitional Provisions) Regulations 2023 [draft] be approved.—[Siobhian Brown]
Motion agreed to.
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 3 May 2023
Audrey Nicoll
Thank you, minister. That was very helpful. We will move to questions.
One or two members want to come in, but I wonder whether I can kick off—pardon the pun—by asking about the designation of a music or sporting event. The definition in the second instrument includes reference to an event venue that has
“capacity for 1,000 or more attendees”.
Could there be issues around the use of pyrotechnics at a venue that has a smaller capacity than that, such as a smaller football ground? Up in the north-east, we have quite a number of small football teams. I am not suggesting for one moment that they have an issue with pyrotechnics, but, technically, there could be an issue in a smaller venue. Has there been any consideration of venues that have a capacity of fewer than 1,000 attendees?