The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of ³ÉÈË¿ìÊÖ and committees will automatically update to show only the ³ÉÈË¿ìÊÖ and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of ³ÉÈË¿ìÊÖ and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of ³ÉÈË¿ìÊÖ and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 3527 contributions
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 17 May 2023
Audrey Nicoll
There will be a division.
For
Clark, Katy (West Scotland) (Lab)
Findlay, Russell (West Scotland) (Con)
Greene, Jamie (West Scotland) (Con)
McNeill, Pauline (Glasgow) (Lab)
Against
MacGregor, Fulton (Coatbridge and Chryston) (SNP)
Mackay, Rona (Strathkelvin and Bearsden) (SNP)
Nicoll, Audrey (Aberdeen South and North Kincardine) (SNP)
Stevenson, Collette (East Kilbride) (SNP)
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 17 May 2023
Audrey Nicoll
The result of the division is: For 4, Against 4, Abstentions 0.
There is an equality of votes. As convener, I will use my casting vote and vote against the amendment.
Amendment 80 disagreed to.
Amendment 81 to 89 not moved.
Section 7, as amended, agreed to.
After section 7
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 17 May 2023
Audrey Nicoll
The result of the division is: For 4, Against 4, Abstentions 0.
As there is an equality of votes, as convener, I will use my casting vote. I vote against the amendment.
Amendment 93 disagreed to.
Amendment 94 moved—[Rona Mackay]—and agreed to.
Amendment 38 not moved.
Section 8, as amended, agreed to.
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 17 May 2023
Audrey Nicoll
It is now 25 past 11, so we deserve a short break. I suspend the meeting for around 10 minutes. I ask members to be back and ready to go at 11.35.
11:25 Meeting suspended.Section 9—Duty to engage in release planning
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 17 May 2023
Audrey Nicoll
The next group of amendments relates to release planning. Amendment 95, in the name of Russell Findlay, is grouped with amendments 39, 96 to 98, 40, 99 and 41.
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 17 May 2023
Audrey Nicoll
Thank you, cabinet secretary—I note your comments.
I invite Douglas Lumsden to wind up, if he wishes to make any further comments, and say whether he wishes to press or withdraw amendment 100.
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 17 May 2023
Audrey Nicoll
The question is, that amendment 100 be agreed to. Are we agreed?
Members: No.
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 17 May 2023
Audrey Nicoll
There will be a division.
For
Clark, Katy (West Scotland) (Lab)
Findlay, Russell (West Scotland) (Con)
Greene, Jamie (West Scotland) (Con)
McNeill, Pauline (Glasgow) (Lab)
Against
MacGregor, Fulton (Coatbridge and Chryston) (SNP)
Mackay, Rona (Strathkelvin and Bearsden) (SNP)
Nicoll, Audrey (Aberdeen South and North Kincardine) (SNP)
Stevenson, Collette (East Kilbride) (SNP)
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 17 May 2023
Audrey Nicoll
As no other member wishes to speak, I call Katy Clark to wind up and to press or withdraw amendment 42.
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 17 May 2023
Audrey Nicoll
The question is, that amendment 102 be agreed to. Are we agreed?
Members: No.