The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of łÉČËżěĘÖ and committees will automatically update to show only the łÉČËżěĘÖ and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of łÉČËżěĘÖ and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of łÉČËżěĘÖ and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 3579 contributions
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 21 June 2023
Audrey Nicoll
On that note, we will move swiftly on.
Our next item of business is consideration of any final issues that we want to raise in our report on the supplementary LCM. Again, I will open up the meeting for members to raise any specific points.
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 21 June 2023
Audrey Nicoll
I remind members that we will be having a public evidence session next week on the issue of police officer suicide, which I hope will be an opportunity to raise some of the issues that Russell Findlay has outlined. I know that he is very interested in that particular issue.
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 21 June 2023
Audrey Nicoll
I know that DBI has been an option for a number of years, and it is relatively straightforward. My understanding is that police officers can use DBI as a referral option for somebody they encounter who is experiencing poor mental health. Ultimately, that would normally be routed to the person’s GP, who would pick up the referral and engage with the person. There may be some other points of contact along that pathway. I know that it is considered to be a successful, user-friendly and well-established option. If it is helpful, and if members are happy to do so, we can ask for some more detail on DBI. I think it is quite an important tool in the toolbox overall.
Jamie, was your second point in relation to the enhanced mental health pathway?
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 21 June 2023
Audrey Nicoll
Nobody else wants to come in.
Russell Findlay and Jamie Greene have both made a lot of reasonable points. The letter sets out the current position around legislation, which, in the context of this discussion around pyrotechnics, has perhaps one or two gaps.
I was pleased to read that the minister, along with officials, is having
“further discussions with Police Scotland, football clubs and authorities, and other ... stakeholders, about the effectiveness of FBOs.”
The point that you made latterly, Jamie, around the course of conduct, is key. We may be able to ask about that, but it is my understanding that a course of conduct would be anticipated before an order would be placed on someone. That is a practical issue at the moment. A lifelong ban would apply if a series of incidents—a course of conduct—indicated that a person was not desisting from their behaviour but continued taking pyrotechnics into a ground.
We have noted the points that have been raised. If the committee is in agreement, we can put those further questions to the minister.
Members: indicated agreement.
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 21 June 2023
Audrey Nicoll
We move straight to questions from members, starting with Jamie Greene.
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 21 June 2023
Audrey Nicoll
Our final item of business is consideration of correspondence on the issue of policing and mental health. I refer members to paper 4.
I thank the cabinet secretary for her helpful update and certainly welcome the creation of a cross-ministerial working group on this important subject. I hope that the committee’s interest in the issue, and the priority that we have given to it, is beginning to have an impact. We are beginning to see some progress on addressing the matters that we have highlighted.
Do members want to raise any points about the cabinet secretary’s letter or ask any further questions?
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 21 June 2023
Audrey Nicoll
Again, I am more than happy to pick up that point and ask for some more information and detail on it. Are members happy with that?
Members indicated agreement.
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 21 June 2023
Audrey Nicoll
If members have no further points to raise, that concludes our business for this morning. I will now close the meeting, and we will take a short break before moving into an informal private session.
Meeting closed at 10:58.Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 21 June 2023
Audrey Nicoll
We almost did it.
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 21 June 2023
Audrey Nicoll
One of the things that I would like to highlight in the report is the Scottish Government’s position that, where the UK Government intends to take powers to make secondary legislation in devolved areas, that must be accompanied by effective mechanisms to respect the devolution settlement and to recognise the responsibilities of Scottish ministers and the Scottish Parliament. Currently, the Scottish Parliament has no process for scrutinising that subordinate legislation. At this stage, it is not clear what information the Scottish Government will provide to the Parliament to facilitate such scrutiny.
I propose that we should make those points in our report. It is to be hoped that other members will agree.
Are members content for the committee to raise those points?