The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of ˿ and committees will automatically update to show only the ˿ and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of ˿ and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of ˿ and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 3527 contributions
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 1 November 2023
Audrey Nicoll
In the context of the proposals potentially being a little bit more ambitious, is that feasible?
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 1 November 2023
Audrey Nicoll
In part 3, there is a proposal to extend special measures to civil cases, and you have just outlined the implications for IT systems from that. Should the proposals be expanded from what they are at the moment in the bill? Would that have any impact?
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 1 November 2023
Audrey Nicoll
Thank you. Your submission sets out the impact of reduced resources, particularly due to the increase in your statutory functions. For example, you highlight the expansion of arrest referral services, increases in the number of diversion from prosecution cases and a number of other areas. If that is the case—I am sure that it is—that will be at one end of the system, so what are your concerns about the impact that that will have on the preventative work that we want to be developed? That contemporary effective work is well set out in “The Vision for Justice in Scotland”.
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 1 November 2023
Audrey Nicoll
Okay. I will open this up to members and bring in Russell Findlay to kick off.
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 1 November 2023
Audrey Nicoll
Thank you. A few more members would like to come in and then we will have to call the session to a close. Rona Mackay and then Pauline McNeill.
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 25 October 2023
Audrey Nicoll
Is there anything further that you want to add to what you were outlining?
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 25 October 2023
Audrey Nicoll
I want to ask a question about the proposed register of solicitors. The Law Society of Scotland’s submission raises concerns about how that register would work in practice. Those include a concern about how much detail will potentially be left to secondary legislation. Does Stuart Munro want to pick up on that and add any other comments? I will then seek the views of Jonathan Campbell and Jamie Foulis on the concerns that have been raised.
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 25 October 2023
Audrey Nicoll
Okay. Thank you very much.
As no one else has any comments to make, are members content that we write to the Scottish Government on whether the intention is for the pilot to be retrospective and for it to be open to the survivors who first raised the issue, and that, in doing so, we flag the other points that members have made, in particular around the application form and the need for the process to be trauma informed? I imagine that that will be at the centre of that piece of work. We will also note the comments that Pauline McNeill made on simplifying the process of transcript production. Do members agree to that proposal?
Members indicated agreement.
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 25 October 2023
Audrey Nicoll
Our next agenda item is discussion of the annual report of His Majesty’s Inspectorate of Prosecution in Scotland. Specifically, Laura Paton, inspector of prosecution at the Crown Office and Procurator Fiscal Service, has raised several concerns over the current model for the provision of forensic pathology services in Scotland. Those concerns are outlined in the annual report, extracts from which can be found in paper 4. Laura Paton has described the efforts to reform the forensic pathology system as
“ad hoc, rather than transformational”,
and she notes the COPFS’s preference to move towards a national forensic pathology service.
We are invited to consider whether to ask COPFS, the national health service and the Scottish Government for their views on the points raised by the inspector of prosecution, and to ask whether there are any further plans to review the current model for providing forensic pathology services in Scotland. I ask for members’ views on our proposed course of action.
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 25 October 2023
Audrey Nicoll
I will intervene at this point and pull members back to part 1, focusing on the victims commissioner. I do not like being too precious about questioning, but can we pull it back so that members have the opportunity to explore part 1 first? I apologise for interrupting you, Stuart Munro.