The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of 成人快手 and committees will automatically update to show only the 成人快手 and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of 成人快手 and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of 成人快手 and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 3579 contributions
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 10 January 2024
Audrey Nicoll
Thank you Lady Dorrian. We appreciate your taking the time to join us this morning. We will now have a short suspension.
10:45 Meeting suspended.Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 10 January 2024
Audrey Nicoll
Thank you鈥攖hat is helpful. I know that Pauline McNeill wants to come in, so I will ask my final question, which is on the anonymity of victims. The report recommends 鈥渆xpress legislative protection鈥 for the anonymity of victims of sexual offences. I am interested in hearing about the reasons for that recommendation. What difference do you think that such protection would make to victims?
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 10 January 2024
Audrey Nicoll
Thank you. I will open up questions to members.
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 10 January 2024
Audrey Nicoll
We move to our next panel, and I welcome to the meeting David Fraser, executive director, and Danielle McLaughlin, head of the Lord Justice Clerk鈥檚 review, from the Scottish Courts and Tribunals Service. I intend to allow about 40 minutes for this session.
I will open with a general question, and it will come as no surprise that it is about the proposal for a specialist sexual offences court, on which we have already taken quite substantial evidence from the Lord Advocate and Lady Dorrian. Given that the Scottish Courts and Tribunals Service has expressed support for the creation of a sexual offences court, will you outline what, in your view, would be the main benefits of such a court as well as some of the challenges that could be faced?
12:15Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 10 January 2024
Audrey Nicoll
That was helpful.
Mr Fraser, we asked the Lord Advocate and Lady Dorrian about putting in place a specialist approach in the existing court structure, so, in the spirit of consistency, I note that early in your contribution, you articulated the fact that the current system has two tiers. We have heard it argued that the current system should become more specialised instead of our going to the bother of creating a bespoke court. Is there anything further that you would like to add on that point?
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 10 January 2024
Audrey Nicoll
On that note, we are running out of time, so I thank our witnesses for attending. The session has been helpful. That completes this agenda item.
I remind members that we are meeting again tomorrow at lunch time to look at the management of transgender prisoners and two related Scottish statutory instruments.
Next week, we will return to the Victims, Witnesses, and Justice Reform (Scotland) Bill with evidence from survivors of sexual offences cases and then from victims and survivors organisations. I am sure that it will be a powerful and important session, and I pay tribute in advance to those who will attend. We now move into private session.
13:02 Meeting continued in private until 13:06.Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 10 January 2024
Audrey Nicoll
Thank you for that helpful and comprehensive answer.
One of the things that I have certainly grappled with a little bit is the practical application of a specialist court in a national context. You have helpfully set out a lot of the model鈥檚 benefits, if you like, but did the review consider the challenges with regard to its practical application?
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 10 January 2024
Audrey Nicoll
Good morning, and welcome to the first meeting in 2024 of the Criminal Justice Committee. We have no apologies this morning and our first item of business is an evidence session on the work of the review into improving the management of sexual offences cases in Scotland.
We are pleased to be joined today by Lady Dorrian, Lord Justice Clerk and Senator of the College of Justice. I refer members to papers 1 to 3. Lady Dorrian chaired the review that produced a report on improving the management of sexual offences cases. It is fair to say that the ideas in her report underpin many of the provisions of the Victims, Witnesses, and Justice Reform (Scotland) Bill, on which the committee is currently taking stage 1 evidence. We are pleased that Lady Dorrian is joining us this morning to speak about her report. I intend to allow up to 75 minutes for this session.
I invite Lady Dorrian to make a short opening statement.
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 10 January 2024
Audrey Nicoll
Thank you. I am sure that other members will have some follow-up questions on the court model.
I now open it up to questions from members. I call John Swinney, to be followed by Sharon Dowey.
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 10 January 2024
Audrey Nicoll
Thank you, Lady Dorrian. That was a helpful opening overview of the backdrop to the review and the amount of work that has been done over a number of years. I am interested in what you said about trying to introduce new ways of thinking to transform procedures that are rooted in the Victorian era.
I will open with a general question about the second recommendation in the report, which relates to the establishment of a sexual offences court. It sets out a wide range of key features, including pre-recorded evidence, judicial case management and many others. I am interested in whether the review considered, from a practical perspective, whether similar benefits might be achieved through the implementation of specialism in existing court structures, in particular given that the number of sexual offences cases that are reported to the Crown Office is steadily increasing.