The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of 成人快手 and committees will automatically update to show only the 成人快手 and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of 成人快手 and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of 成人快手 and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 3578 contributions
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 31 January 2024
Audrey Nicoll
I remind members that we are looking at parts 1 to 4 of the bill.
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 31 January 2024
Audrey Nicoll
As ever, a number of members would like to ask supplementary questions. We are dealing with a really important part of the bill. I will bring in Pauline McNeill and then John Swinney. I ask them to be as brief as possible.
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 31 January 2024
Audrey Nicoll
John Swinney is happy not to come back in. Katy Clark has a question.
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 31 January 2024
Audrey Nicoll
On that positive note, I thank the Lord Advocate for joining us. That has been immensely helpful.
We will have a short suspension to allow for a change of witnesses.
10:06 Meeting suspended.Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 31 January 2024
Audrey Nicoll
Before I bring in Pauline McNeill, I will ask a couple of questions about the proposals for the rape trial pilot. As we know, the judiciary鈥檚 submission reflected different opinions on the proposal, which were well set out and helpful. However, we recently took evidence from Professor Vanessa Munro who said, in relation to the proposal for a time-limited pilot:
鈥淚n our written submission, we have tried to say that a judge-only pilot would not be an unreasonable move for gathering more evidence, and that is akin to what Lady Dorrian said in her testimony to the committee on the importance of developing a stronger evidence base for comparison.鈥
She went on:
鈥淧art of the reason for having a pilot would be to learn more about what that alternative would look like and what change it may or may not result in.鈥濃擺Official Report, Criminal Justice Committee, 24 January 2024; c 17.]
Given that we have heard different views on the proposals for a pilot, I wonder whether you, on behalf of the judiciary, have a thought or opinion on how we take that information together鈥攂oth sides of the coin, if you like鈥攁nd what a pilot could look like, perhaps with some different thinking around the proposal as it is set out in the bill, if that makes sense.
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 31 January 2024
Audrey Nicoll
Thank you. We will come back to that. Seonaid Stevenson-McCabe, would you like to add anything?
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 31 January 2024
Audrey Nicoll
Before I bring in Russell Findlay, I have a slightly left-field question. Should the provisions on anonymity be extended to the accused? I do not know whether you have looked at that issue in the scope of your work, but, in any case, I would be interested to know what, if any, views you have on that.
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 31 January 2024
Audrey Nicoll
That is interesting. I will bring in Russell Findlay.
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 31 January 2024
Audrey Nicoll
I will bring in Sharon Dowey in a moment. First, following on from Pauline McNeill鈥檚 final question, the issue that has come into my head during the session is victims鈥 autonomy. We have spoken about their choices and the extent of their control. Which factors should be considered in how we inform a victim about their choices on anonymity, so that we balance the legislative provisions with aspects such as their welfare and their right to autonomy? It is more of a practical question about what that would look like. How do we tell them what anonymity is and what it means for them?
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 31 January 2024
Audrey Nicoll
That is an interesting point.