The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of łÉČËżěĘÖ and committees will automatically update to show only the łÉČËżěĘÖ and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of łÉČËżěĘÖ and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of łÉČËżěĘÖ and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 3578 contributions
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 31 January 2024
Audrey Nicoll
Thank you. Sheriff Cubie, do you want to add anything before I open questioning to members?
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 31 January 2024
Audrey Nicoll
Thank you. I know that members will want to come back to look at that a lot more closely.
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 31 January 2024
Audrey Nicoll
I welcome our second panel for today: the Rt Hon Lord Matthews, senator of the College of Justice; and Sheriff Andrew Cubie, sheriff of Glasgow and Strathkelvin, appeal sheriff and temporary High Court judge. Welcome to you both; we are very grateful that you have been able to give up time to join us this morning.
I intend to allow up to 90 minutes for this panel. I propose that we focus our questions initially on the proposal for a new sexual offences court, before moving on to jury majorities, the proposals for a pilot for judge-led trials in certain rape cases, the proposals for independent legal representation for complainers, and, finally, anonymity for victims of sexual offences.
I understand that neither of our witnesses wishes to make an opening statement, so I will open up with a couple of general questions.
The first is on the proposals for the specialist sexual offences court. I will come to Lord Matthews first and then to Sheriff Cubie. What are your views—I mean, rather, what are the views of the judiciary—on the idea of creating a specialist sexual offences court? Is it supported, and if so, why?
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 31 January 2024
Audrey Nicoll
I have a follow-up question for Lord Matthews. I am interested in the views of the judiciary on what the Scottish Government is proposing for how the new court might operate and what it would look like, given that it is not being proposed as a new division of the High Court.
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 31 January 2024
Audrey Nicoll
I will ask the question in a different way. As a committee, what should we be thinking about with regard to what a pilot is seeking to achieve? Again, the judiciary has a range of views on that.
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 31 January 2024
Audrey Nicoll
Thank you. I found your written submission fascinating. I had not known that there was quite so much in and around the subject, so it was really interesting to get your perspective. From your very informed and expert perspective, what are your general views on the provisions that are set out in the bill?
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 31 January 2024
Audrey Nicoll
We have spoken a lot about social media, and I was interested in your response about how it appears that there are greater restrictions on broadcast media than there are on social media. Many social media platforms sit outwith the UK. How difficult would that make our scrutiny of how social media companies are upholding anonymity for victims?
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 31 January 2024
Audrey Nicoll
You have spoken about children in response to Russell Findlay’s line of questioning. I will read out what you have written in your submission.
“It is critical that Scots law respects the legitimate autonomy of complainers in these cases and facilitates their decisions to share—or not to share—their experiences, without imposing additional legal or economic costs”.
You go on to say:
“Finding the right balance ... may be particularly challenging in terms of child complainers”.
Could you outline a wee bit more about your research, specifically on the issues that have an impact on children?
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 31 January 2024
Audrey Nicoll
I will open up the discussion to members. Pauline McNeill wants to pick up on the matter of a victims commissioner.
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 31 January 2024
Audrey Nicoll
Yes.