The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of 成人快手 and committees will automatically update to show only the 成人快手 and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of 成人快手 and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of 成人快手 and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 3500 contributions
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 31 January 2024
Audrey Nicoll
Yes.
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 31 January 2024
Audrey Nicoll
Thank you very much, Lord Matthews. You have set out a very comprehensive and well-articulated position. I will bring in Sheriff Cubie on that same question.
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 31 January 2024
Audrey Nicoll
Sheriff Cubie, would you like to come in on that?
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 31 January 2024
Audrey Nicoll
That helpfully leads into a question that I was going to ask. Staying with the rape trial pilot, this concerns a point that has come up in evidence, which I was very interested in. During previous evidence, it was suggested that some of the concerns about the pilot without juries might be lessened if there were more than one judge involved in a ruling. I am interested in whether the judiciary has a view on that proposal, as a hypothetical. I will also bring in Sheriff Cubie on that.
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 31 January 2024
Audrey Nicoll
That is understood.
I will close this part of the evidence session. Thank you both for your attendance, which has been hugely helpful to us.
11:28 Meeting suspended.Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 31 January 2024
Audrey Nicoll
I welcome our final panel today. They are Dr Andrew Tickell and Seonaid Stevenson-McCabe, who are both lecturers in law in Glasgow Caledonian University鈥檚 department of economics and law. We are very grateful that you have been able to join us. I intend to allow about 45 minutes for this session, in which we will primarily focus on the proposal to grant automatic lifelong anonymity to victims in sexual offences cases.
I will open with a broad question. Will you outline the work that you have done as part of the Glasgow Caledonian University project on complainer anonymity, and the main findings of that research?
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 31 January 2024
Audrey Nicoll
Thank you. I will ask a couple of other questions later, but I now open the discussion to members.
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 31 January 2024
Audrey Nicoll
Thank you for that nice round-up. It is most helpful.
I will close the session now. I thank the witnesses very much for attending. It has been fascinating evidence.
Next week, we will return to the Victims, Witnesses, and Justice Reform (Scotland) Bill with two meetings. The first is on Tuesday with the Scottish Solicitors Bar Association, and the second is on Wednesday with the Cabinet Secretary for Justice and Home Affairs. That will be our final evidence session on the bill.
12:33 Meeting continued in private until 13:05.Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 31 January 2024
Audrey Nicoll
You have spoken about children in response to Russell Findlay鈥檚 line of questioning. I will read out what you have written in your submission.
鈥淚t is critical that Scots law respects the legitimate autonomy of complainers in these cases and facilitates their decisions to share鈥攐r not to share鈥攖heir experiences, without imposing additional legal or economic costs鈥.
You go on to say:
鈥淔inding the right balance ... may be particularly challenging in terms of child complainers鈥.
Could you outline a wee bit more about your research, specifically on the issues that have an impact on children?
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 31 January 2024
Audrey Nicoll
That is a helpful update and clarification.
The bill sets out a number of proposals on the victims commissioner鈥檚 role. In general, beyond what is set out in the bill, is there anything else that you feel would be relevant to include in that role, or are you supportive of the provisions as they stand? From your previous answer, I think that you are.