The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of ˿ and committees will automatically update to show only the ˿ and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of ˿ and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of ˿ and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 3543 contributions
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 15 May 2024
Audrey Nicoll
That is very helpful.
The other point that I was thinking about relates to those probably very infrequent circumstances when an officer’s status might change from witness to suspect. How does that work?
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 15 May 2024
Audrey Nicoll
I have a couple of questions. The first is about the governance of the PIRC and the second is a more general question around the existence of commissioners, which I will explain in a moment.
On governance, I note that the Angiolini review stated:
“the Commissioner has confirmed that she is planning to transform the Audit and Accountability Committee into a more formal Board structure with non-executive members being appointed through a transparent public appointments process”.
Do you have an update on that recommendation? Have those changes been made? If so, are they sufficient? Are they working?
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 15 May 2024
Audrey Nicoll
I confirm that we are looking at the LCMs.
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 15 May 2024
Audrey Nicoll
Not at all. These things happen. Back to you, cabinet secretary.
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 15 May 2024
Audrey Nicoll
Thank you, cabinet secretary.
I think that Katy Clark would like to ask a question. No? That is fine. Do any other members have any questions?
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 15 May 2024
Audrey Nicoll
I thank the cabinet secretary for joining us. I briefly suspend the meeting to allow for a change of witnesses.
09:51 Meeting suspended.Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 15 May 2024
Audrey Nicoll
Thank you, cabinet secretary. I invite questions from members.
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 15 May 2024
Audrey Nicoll
I am sure that there is a very small chance of it happening, but is there a risk that an officer’s status could change from being a witness to a suspect? That might present a slight challenge in relation to the duty of candour and compliance with a co-operative approach.
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 15 May 2024
Audrey Nicoll
It was criminal.
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 15 May 2024
Audrey Nicoll
I welcome to the meeting Mr Justin Farrell, who is head of the criminal allegations against the police division of the Crown Office and Procurator Fiscal Service. I thank Mr Farrell for providing written evidence. We are looking to spend an hour or so on this evidence session.
I will kick things off by following up on Sharon Dowey’s line of questioning with the PIRC a short time ago. This relates to criminal allegations against police officers. We are aware that a criminal allegation against a police officer would be reported to the Crown Office based on “a reasonable inference” that they have committed an offence—that is different from what happens with ordinary members of the public. How do you identify potentially malicious or vexatious complaints within the system, and how is it ensured that that identification takes place as early as possible in the process, so that officers are not subjected to lengthy and unnecessary investigations?