The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of 成人快手 and committees will automatically update to show only the 成人快手 and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of 成人快手 and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of 成人快手 and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 3500 contributions
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 8 May 2024
Audrey Nicoll
Thank you, that has given us a helpful bit of background.
Genevieve Lennon, the point about monitoring was touched on in the SIPR submission. It is all very well to have a code of ethics that looks nice and shiny and new, but what is important is the application of the code of ethics and ensuring that its effectiveness continues as, for example, new officers come in, policing functions change and so on. Can you expand on what was in your submission on that point?
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 8 May 2024
Audrey Nicoll
Thank you for that. I understand what you are saying鈥攜ou have set things out very clearly. The evidence that we have had so far suggests that there is support for a duty of candour, and that it perhaps reflects a robust approach to dealing with complaints and conduct issues, and transparency. Given what you have said, would the establishment of a duty of candour necessarily change what you have described? You do not see that there is an issue. I want to be clear about why a duty of candour would necessarily change that.
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 8 May 2024
Audrey Nicoll
Okay. Thank you very much.
I open it up to questions from members. I will bring in Katy Clark and then Russell Findlay.
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 8 May 2024
Audrey Nicoll
Okay, and then I will bring in Fulton MacGregor.
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 8 May 2024
Audrey Nicoll
That is a helpful point.
Kate, this is a big question but, given that Victim Support Scotland is such a front-facing organisation, I am interested in hearing your views on your experience of engaging with the PIRC.
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 8 May 2024
Audrey Nicoll
Okay. I am going to pull the evidence session to a close. Thank you all for joining us and for your time. It has been a really interesting session.
We will have a short suspension to allow a changeover of witnesses.
11:06 Meeting suspended.Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 8 May 2024
Audrey Nicoll
That is a helpful clarification.
This has been an interesting session, and we have covered quite a lot. Thank you for coming along today; we appreciate your time.
That concludes the public part of our meeting, and we will now move into private session.
12:47 Meeting continued in private until 13:13.Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 8 May 2024
Audrey Nicoll
I am sure that members will come back with some more questions on that interesting notion around an ethics culture survey. That is certainly a new one on me.
I have one follow-up question around breaches of the code and the implications of breaches. What came into my head when you set that out was how easy or difficult the practicalities of being able to respond to breaches of the code would be, given the vast range of breaches that could take place. Do you have a view on that?
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 8 May 2024
Audrey Nicoll
Recommendation 6 in the 鈥淗MICS Thematic Inspection of Organisational Culture in Police Scotland鈥, which was published in December last year, is:
鈥淧olice Scotland and the Scottish Police Authority should reinforce the human rights and ethics-based approach for all policing activity.鈥
I think that Victim Support Scotland鈥檚 submission refers to that. It seems that different areas of work are all coming back to the same conclusions. I open this question up to all members of the panel. Will the bill in its current form address that recommendation and what we have just heard regarding the public sector equality duty?
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 8 May 2024
Audrey Nicoll
I warmly welcome to the meeting Chief Superintendent Rob Hay from the Association of Scottish Police Superintendents; David Kennedy, who is general secretary of the Scottish Police Federation; and David Malcolm, who is branch secretary of the Unison police staff Scotland branch. Thank you for your written evidence and for joining us today.
I intend to allow around an hour and a half for this evidence session. I will start with Chief Superintendent Hay and move across the panel.
I have a couple of questions about the proposed duty of candour. Do you think that the duty of candour, as set out in the bill, is sufficient in respect of ensuring the timely co-operation of police officers and staff in investigations? Is more required, or do you have a different view on the duty of candour? For example, one issue that has come up is whether it should include a duty of co-operation. There are a few sub-questions in there.
11:15