The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of 成人快手 and committees will automatically update to show only the 成人快手 and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of 成人快手 and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of 成人快手 and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 3543 contributions
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 15 May 2024
Audrey Nicoll
Do members agree to delegate responsibility to me and the clerks to approve a short factual report to the Parliament on this affirmative SSI?
Members indicated agreement.
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 15 May 2024
Audrey Nicoll
Thanks very much for that comprehensive answer. I will now bring in Sharon Dowey, after which we will draw our session to a close.
11:15Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 15 May 2024
Audrey Nicoll
I will bring in other members and then come back to you.
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 15 May 2024
Audrey Nicoll
Thanks for the clarification. I see that Phillip Chapman and Sharon Clelland do not have anything to add, so I will move on. I should say that I am also interested in some of the comments in your submission about safeguarding, but I will come back to that later.
I call Russell Findlay.
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 15 May 2024
Audrey Nicoll
We are a bit ahead of time, but I am going to draw this session to a close.
I thank our witnesses for coming along this morning. Your evidence has been very helpful, and we appreciate your time.
We will now have a short suspension to allow for a changeover of witnesses.
11:19 Meeting suspended.Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 15 May 2024
Audrey Nicoll
The committee heard evidence from a witness, a former police officer, who had been the subject of a criminal investigation in relation to an incident that had happened while he was on duty. He subsequently left the service. During his evidence, he spoke about what he described as the 鈥渨eaponisation鈥 of the system against people who make complaints. That is quite a big claim to make. I am interested in whether you have seen any evidence of that. Do you recognise that characterisation?
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 15 May 2024
Audrey Nicoll
Thank you. Can I just go back to why we have the different threshold? You set out some information at the beginning of your earlier response, and I think that I am right to interpret that as meaning that there is, with police officers, perhaps a higher expectation of adherence to discipline and good conduct. In itself, that brings us to the point where we have a lower reporting threshold. I am struggling slightly to set that against the safeguarding issues that we touched on in the previous evidence session and compliance around human rights. Do you have a comment on that?
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 15 May 2024
Audrey Nicoll
That is really helpful clarification. I am going to open up the discussion and bring in Rona Mackay.
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 15 May 2024
Audrey Nicoll
That is the tricky bit.
That brings us up to time. Thank you for joining us, Mr Farrell鈥攖he evidence has been very helpful.
That concludes the public part of our meeting, and we now move into private session.
12:31 Meeting continued in private until 13:08.Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 15 May 2024
Audrey Nicoll
There are no other questions from members. Is the committee content to recommend to the Parliament that consent should be given for the relevant provisions covered by LCM-S6-43 and LCM-S6-43a?
Members indicated agreement.