成人快手

Skip to main content
Loading…

Chamber and committees

Official Report: search what was said in Parliament

The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.  

Filter your results Hide all filters

Dates of parliamentary sessions
  1. Session 1: 12 May 1999 to 31 March 2003
  2. Session 2: 7 May 2003 to 2 April 2007
  3. Session 3: 9 May 2007 to 22 March 2011
  4. Session 4: 11 May 2011 to 23 March 2016
  5. Session 5: 12 May 2016 to 4 May 2021
  6. Current session: 13 May 2021 to 27 December 2025
Select which types of business to include


Select level of detail in results

Displaying 926 contributions

|

Health, Social Care and Sport Committee [Draft]

Non-surgical Procedures and Functions of Medical Reviewers (Scotland) Bill: Stage 1

Meeting date: 16 December 2025

Jenni Minto

When any legislation comes in, there must be appropriate public messaging and engagement. That was made very clear through the evidence that you received on communication from Douglas White.

We have not set out a specific communication plan. Clearly, we will work on that if the bill is passed, to ensure that the right people get the information. I was asked if I would front the announcement of the consultation. I did not think that somebody in their late 50s would be the right person to do that, so we have to ensure that we target any information to the public in the right way, using channels that people can access.

Health, Social Care and Sport Committee [Draft]

Non-surgical Procedures and Functions of Medical Reviewers (Scotland) Bill: Stage 1

Meeting date: 16 December 2025

Jenni Minto

Yes.

Health, Social Care and Sport Committee [Draft]

Non-surgical Procedures and Functions of Medical Reviewers (Scotland) Bill: Stage 1

Meeting date: 16 December 2025

Jenni Minto

Yes.

Health, Social Care and Sport Committee [Draft]

Non-surgical Procedures and Functions of Medical Reviewers (Scotland) Bill: Stage 1

Meeting date: 16 December 2025

Jenni Minto

That is a really interesting question about an issue that has preyed on my mind since the first round-table meeting that I attended, when it was made clear that there is no way of specifying in records how an impact has occurred. For example, there is no part of a person鈥檚 NHS records that says that something was done specifically in response to a Botox injection or whatever. We did work to assess whether we could change that, but the whole reason for bringing in regulation in this area is to ensure that we have better records of the impacts, and that will be provided as part of the regulation work that Healthcare Improvement Scotland will do.

Health, Social Care and Sport Committee [Draft]

Non-surgical Procedures and Functions of Medical Reviewers (Scotland) Bill: Stage 1

Meeting date: 16 December 2025

Jenni Minto

The committee heard evidence from one of the practitioners that, if they were concerned that something could be cancerous, they would direct their client to their GP, which is the right thing to do. That situation absolutely falls under the public safety element of the bill. The committee took a lot of evidence about educating the public, and your question fits into that. You raise an important point, which I am happy to take away and think about. I will ensure that we have taken proper consideration of what you have said.

Health, Social Care and Sport Committee [Draft]

Non-surgical Procedures and Functions of Medical Reviewers (Scotland) Bill: Stage 1

Meeting date: 16 December 2025

Jenni Minto

Given that the underlying aim of the bill is to protect public health, I am content to look at that.

Health, Social Care and Sport Committee [Draft]

Non-surgical Procedures and Functions of Medical Reviewers (Scotland) Bill: Stage 1

Meeting date: 16 December 2025

Jenni Minto

If I have understood you correctly, you are saying that the antidote, because it is a separate prescription, needs to be held on the premises to ensure a timely intervention. That is exactly why we are saying that we need healthcare clinician specialists on site when the procedures are being carried out.

Owen Griffiths is champing at the bit to say something.

Health, Social Care and Sport Committee [Draft]

Non-surgical Procedures and Functions of Medical Reviewers (Scotland) Bill: Stage 1

Meeting date: 16 December 2025

Jenni Minto

As I said to Dr Gulhane, we are still in discussions with the UK Government to understand what we can do as a result of the United Kingdom Internal Market Act 2020. When HIS is regulating specific businesses, there is a provision in legislation that says that those businesses need to be staffed appropriately. Our work on supervision runs in parallel with Healthcare Improvement Scotland and with the work that we are doing on UKIMA.

At this time, I cannot say how many people would be required to be supervised. That will be worked through once we understand the level of training and qualifications and the regulations that Healthcare Improvement Scotland deems appropriate to ensure the proper, robust regulation of those businesses.

Health, Social Care and Sport Committee [Draft]

Non-surgical Procedures and Functions of Medical Reviewers (Scotland) Bill: Stage 1

Meeting date: 16 December 2025

Jenni Minto

As Owen Griffiths said, that is currently the situation with HIS-regulated premises. We are currently looking at whether that would be the requirement in this instance. It is about striking a balance and ensuring that each place to which people can go for such treatments is as safe as possible.

Health, Social Care and Sport Committee [Draft]

Non-surgical Procedures and Functions of Medical Reviewers (Scotland) Bill: Stage 1

Meeting date: 16 December 2025

Jenni Minto

That is a really important question, and we will be discussing it in more detail with HIS. A key element of the bill is that premises are properly regulated, hygienic and safe. That is the work that we are currently doing with HIS.