The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of 成人快手 and committees will automatically update to show only the 成人快手 and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of 成人快手 and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of 成人快手 and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 1442 contributions
Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 20 May 2025
Siobhian Brown
Yes, I think that all those issues can be considered. I do not know whether there is anything different in your question compared with the original question on the notice period as between landlord and tenant, but we will be considering those aspects, and we will write to the committee about that.
Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 20 May 2025
Siobhian Brown
I ask Michael Paparakis to comment on that.
Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 20 May 2025
Siobhian Brown
I have not seen any data on those specific figures.
Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 20 May 2025
Siobhian Brown
Communication between landlord and tenant is vital, especially when it comes to serving notice and bringing the lease to an end, and sections 27 and 28 will resolve the issues with that.
The committee has heard from the Federation of Small Businesses that, in general, it is common for tenants to have problems in getting in touch with their landlord, and not just in the context of serving a document. I understand that some respondents consider that withholding rent because of a failure to provide a UK address is disproportionate, but a majority of consultees who responded to the SLC consultation on the issue were content with the remedy.
Retention of rent is not the sole remedy for the tenant and, of course, it is open to tenants not to exercise the remedy at all or even to retain only a small proportion of the rent. I also point out that the bill sets out a wide range of circumstances in which the remedy cannot be applied. For example, it cannot be applied if a UK postal address for the party is included in the lease or in certain documents that are registered in the land register or recorded in the register of sasines, where the other party to the lease has been given a copy of the document. Further, the provision does not apply to a body corporate or other legal person with a registered office in the UK, and it does not apply where the duration of the lease is less than a year.
That is similar to the statutory provision for residential leases in England and Wales in section 48(1) of the Landlord and Tenant Act 1987, which addresses the difficulties that residential tenants have when they do not have UK postal addresses for their landlord. I think that the provision will come into force for a very small minority of people who do not have a UK address.
Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 20 May 2025
Siobhian Brown
From my understanding, when the Scottish Law Commission drafted the bill, its intention was to make the legislation more accessible, but also to modernise it. I think that someone said that you could google the terminology to find out what it means, but should you need to google a Latin word in 2025?
That is my understanding of the issue. Lori Pidgeon or Michael Paparakis might have further input.
Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 20 May 2025
Siobhian Brown
At this stage, yes.
Do you want to add anything, Michael?
Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 20 May 2025
Siobhian Brown
I know that a few suggestions have been made to the committee. I will have to go away and consider them with my officials before I comment on any of them.
Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 20 May 2025
Siobhian Brown
The provisions in the bill on oral notice by tenants reflect the law as it is at the moment. For those who think that a tenant should give notice in writing, there is flexibility in the bill to provide for that. It is open to the parties to agree a provision in the lease that written notice must be given to terminate it鈥攕ection 23 allows for that. To be clear, oral notice can be given by the tenant only when the lease is for less than a year, so that will not apply in all cases.
Leases of less than a year in duration tend to be more informal in nature and do not need to be in writing. They are of particular value to businesses that need flexibility because they are involved in temporary activities or are testing new markets, for example by operating concessions or food stands.
Requiring tenants to give written notice in all circumstances would be a significant change in the current law, and the Scottish Law Commission did not consult on it. It could also create a trap for small business people, who might think that, because they have entered into a lease by way of an oral agreement, they can terminate the lease in the same way, but they might find themselves having to continue to let the premises.
We should reflect on the possible unintended consequences that such a change in the law could have, particularly for small businesses when they are starting out.
10:30Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 20 May 2025
Siobhian Brown
Yes.
Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 20 May 2025
Siobhian Brown
Yes, I know. My advisers have advised that they do not feel that that will be the case, but if something is flagged up, we will consider it.