The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of ˿ and committees will automatically update to show only the ˿ and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of ˿ and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of ˿ and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 1442 contributions
COVID-19 Recovery Committee
Meeting date: 10 March 2022
Siobhian Brown
Thank you.
COVID-19 Recovery Committee
Meeting date: 10 March 2022
Siobhian Brown
Thank you very much for your valuable input. We will probably wait to see the data from this year a bit further down the track.
COVID-19 Recovery Committee
Meeting date: 10 March 2022
Siobhian Brown
Finally, we have Dr Francisco Perez-Reche. I hope that I pronounced that correctly.
COVID-19 Recovery Committee
Meeting date: 10 March 2022
Siobhian Brown
What are some of the issues that are encountered when organising the witnessing of a named person nomination? Does any of them predate the pandemic?
COVID-19 Recovery Committee
Meeting date: 10 March 2022
Siobhian Brown
Thank you. We turn to questions, and I will begin. Some of the previous witnesses in our inquiry have said that, at this stage, it is still very difficult to draw any conclusions on excess deaths and that we might have to wait a considerable time to do that. However, the consultation response from Chest Heart & Stroke Scotland says that, in the past year, there have been
“1,389 more ... deaths at home from heart disease and stroke and 679 fewer in hospital”.
That could be due to people’s reluctance to visit a general practitioner. The response states:
“Latest data shows 25% of people saying they would avoid contacting their GP at the moment.”
Those statistics are very worrying. Lawrence, would you like to comment further?
COVID-19 Recovery Committee
Meeting date: 10 March 2022
Siobhian Brown
Thank you. I agree with you. It is extremely important that people get back the confidence to visit their GP and do not ignore warning signs.
My next question is for Dr Fenton of Public Health Scotland and Dr Perez-Reche. What is your interpretation of the excess deaths data?
COVID-19 Recovery Committee
Meeting date: 10 March 2022
Siobhian Brown
That concludes our evidence session. I thank Dr Chopra and Dr Smyth for their evidence and time. If witnesses would like to provide any further evidence to the committee, they can do so in writing. The clerks are happy to liaise with them on how to do that.
The committee’s next meeting will be 17 March, when we will take evidence from the Cabinet Secretary for Health and Social Care on the inquiry into excess deaths in Scotland since the start of the pandemic. We will also take evidence from the Deputy First Minister and Cabinet Secretary for Covid Recovery on the latest ministerial statement on Covid-19 and subordinate legislation.
11:13 Meeting continued in private until 11:22.COVID-19 Recovery Committee
Meeting date: 3 March 2022
Siobhian Brown
We have a couple of minutes left, so I will bring in Murdo Fraser.
COVID-19 Recovery Committee
Meeting date: 3 March 2022
Siobhian Brown
I am sorry, Professor McKenzie Skene, but we are having a few problems with your sound. We will move on to David Menzies for the moment.
COVID-19 Recovery Committee
Meeting date: 3 March 2022
Siobhian Brown
Brilliant. Thank you very much, and a warm welcome to you.
My first question is about the proposed bankruptcy threshold. The emergency coronavirus legislation increased the debt threshold at which a creditor can make someone bankrupt from £3,000 to £10,000 during the pandemic. The bill proposes to set the threshold permanently at £5,000. What is the panel’s view on the level of the bankruptcy threshold?