The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of 成人快手 and committees will automatically update to show only the 成人快手 and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of 成人快手 and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of 成人快手 and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 1231 contributions
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 9 May 2023
Natalie Don-Innes
Yes, absolutely. That is why I am saying that we really do not want those placements to happen unless they are absolutely essential or for exceptional circumstances. We do not want to remove a young person from everything that they know and from resources and support networks that could be around them. In essence, then, the answer to your question is yes.
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 9 May 2023
Natalie Don-Innes
As far as I am aware, that would take place through the usual budget process. However, if such a specific situation were to become an issue, it could be monitored. In addition, the secure care centres in Scotland are discussing how they can manage such issues. I am confident, therefore, that that could be managed.
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 9 May 2023
Natalie Don-Innes
I am sorry, but I cannot necessarily give an answer as to why those bodies feel that they could not engage. They were involved in the group that was set up to establish the financial memorandum and have been engaged in the continued discussions. You said that the Crown Office and Procurator Fiscal Service had raised concerns. Is that correct?
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 9 May 2023
Natalie Don-Innes
I apologise if I have given the impression that I think that more information will be coming forward. What I meant is that the information that we have gathered from stakeholders thus far, and the evidence that we have heard in committees, will ultimately feed into that process, whereby stakeholders and organisations can come together with Government to discuss those issues and present new costs.
It is not that I believe that there will be any new information. The new memorandum will be based on the discussions and the work of the working group that has already been going on thus far, which will feed into it.
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 9 May 2023
Natalie Don-Innes
Not just now, but the funding would be for the full financial year, so that would not be an issue for secure care centres at the moment.
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 9 May 2023
Natalie Don-Innes
As I said, we are working with local government on that, and examples of where we could have done things differently in the bill have already come up. For example, when we created the financial memorandum, we used the lower number for the projected number of hearings, but we now accept that the higher figure should have been used. That will be updated in any updated financial forecast.
With regard to your wider point about reassurances, I am using that example to show you that we are taking cognisance of decisions that have already been made and where things can be improved, and that we are working with local government to ensure that this runs the way we want it to.
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 9 May 2023
Natalie Don-Innes
Absolutely. It is a priority for us to get this right, because we want it to be implemented appropriately. As I have said, the financial memorandum was a snapshot in time. The committee evidence and scrutiny will feed into it and will help to direct and input to the conversations that will take place on the finances that are needed. We will also continue to press the UK Government for additional funding for joint priorities, and we would welcome support from across the Parliament, the Convention of Scottish Local Authorities and individual local authorities in that respect. I assure the committee that this is absolutely a priority for us, and we are well tuned into it.
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 9 May 2023
Natalie Don-Innes
As far as I am aware, it will take heed of inflation. I will pass over to one of my officials to clarify that.
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 9 May 2023
Natalie Don-Innes
It comes back to what I have been saying. COSLA was involved in the discussions that led to the creation of the financial memorandum. However, I understand that it has now raised specific concerns about the funding. COSLA will be feeding into the 5 June working group and we will be engaging with COSLA and working through the matter in discussion with it. Those reassurances will come as discussions go forward.
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 9 May 2023
Natalie Don-Innes
I would not say that it is not accurate. I would say that, as I mentioned, it was an accurate snapshot of the issues and the finance that would be required at that moment.
The financial memorandum was not based on the engagement with stakeholders but they contributed to it to a high degree. Wider issues, such as the cost of living and inflation, have impacted on it. They could not have been factored in when it was created. As with any legislation, we need to set out the financial considerations for the bill at the time.
I do not necessarily want to say what I think should be in the new financial memorandum; that will be something for the working group to discuss, based on the evidence that we have heard so far and the issues that have arisen with the first financial memorandum.