The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of 成人快手 and committees will automatically update to show only the 成人快手 and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of 成人快手 and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of 成人快手 and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 1071 contributions
Social Justice and Social Security Committee
Meeting date: 16 December 2021
Neil Gray
I am very conscious of time. We have about half an hour left and quite a few colleagues to get through, so I ask that we be quick with questions and answers. It would be helpful if the witnesses could come in when they have something new to add, rather than reiterating points that have already been made.
Social Justice and Social Security Committee
Meeting date: 16 December 2021
Neil Gray
I have one final very brief question, which is predominantly to Keith Park. Do you believe that issues of eligibility, such as the 20m rule, will require reassessment on transfer? Could you give a reason for your thoughts on that, please?
Social Justice and Social Security Committee
Meeting date: 16 December 2021
Neil Gray
That is extremely helpful.
Social Justice and Social Security Committee
Meeting date: 16 December 2021
Neil Gray
Are there any colleagues in the virtual room with any information or input on that question?
Social Justice and Social Security Committee
Meeting date: 16 December 2021
Neil Gray
I am conscious that we have representatives of two UK-wide organisations present. Keith Park and Trisha Hatt, do you have any view on whether the UK Government has any intention to review the 20m rule, which Marie McNair asked about? Clearly, that would answer some of the problems and concerns that have been raised about passporting and the move of people who are currently on DLA to ADP.
Social Justice and Social Security Committee
Meeting date: 9 December 2021
Neil Gray
I want to follow up on one of Miles Briggs鈥檚 questions. I ask Suzie Burt how much of a challenge it has been to raise funds during the pandemic and how useful multiyear funding would have been during this time.
Social Justice and Social Security Committee
Meeting date: 9 December 2021
Neil Gray
I see that Paul Bradley is looking to come back in. Does that reflect the SCVO鈥檚 view as well? Is the spike likely to be a result of people having far more time on their hands due to furlough, so they were able to give more of their time? How do we harness the positive aspect of what has happened during the pandemic to encourage people to keep supporting their local third sector organisations?
Social Justice and Social Security Committee
Meeting date: 9 December 2021
Neil Gray
Glenn Liddall, Ian Bruce and Myles Fitt would also like to make very brief contributions.
Social Justice and Social Security Committee
Meeting date: 9 December 2021
Neil Gray
I am conscious of what you said about the number of your member organisations that had access to furlough鈥攊t seemed a very small number in comparison with other areas of society. Is that due to the very heavy lifting that the third sector did during Covid in providing services to communities across Scotland? I see that Martin Tyson wants to come in.
Social Justice and Social Security Committee
Meeting date: 9 December 2021
Neil Gray
Does Paul Bradley or anyone else on the panel want to reflect on the apparently low number of organisations utilising furlough? That low number suggests to me that a number of organisations had to keep their operations pretty steady throughout the pandemic. Is that an accurate reflection?