The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of łÉČËżěĘÖ and committees will automatically update to show only the łÉČËżěĘÖ and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of łÉČËżěĘÖ and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of łÉČËżěĘÖ and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 1622 contributions
Economy and Fair Work Committee
Meeting date: 4 December 2024
Michelle Thomson
There is a book about that.
Economy and Fair Work Committee
Meeting date: 4 December 2024
Michelle Thomson
I will just quickly ask about that, as I do not want to deviate from Kevin Stewart’s questions. That final say is, in effect, about drawing down funds. Is it the other councils’ understanding that, in the face of what we all understand are critical issues with public sector funding recently, even though a decision might have been made by all the various governance bodies that you have got, ultimately, Government can say, “Well, no, we are putting a pause on it”? I just want that to be made clear.
Economy and Fair Work Committee
Meeting date: 4 December 2024
Michelle Thomson
I will pick up on a few entirely unrelated issues. Some of them have been mentioned this morning, but I also have some other thoughts.
Paul Lawrence, when we were describing the make-up of the programmes, you mentioned that governance has brought a sharpness of focus, which was a very interesting statement to make. Will you give us a little more information on why that is the case? Why did that not exist before? What is it about the wider perspective and the wider geographical pool that a lot of the programmes have brought in?
Economy and Fair Work Committee
Meeting date: 4 December 2024
Michelle Thomson
That is useful.
As we have said, all your deals are mature ones, and you have said that some of the deals have altered quite significantly. I want to explore the extent to which the influence of Government—whether it is the Scottish Government or the UK Government—has led to changes. What percentage of your overall programme costs were, in effect, sunk costs?
I appreciate that there is a flipside. There are necessary change control processes, but one can argue that a change of priorities—you mentioned that there were quite a lot of changes—can sometimes result in sunk costs. We do not know what we do not know. I am just trying to get a sense of the efficiency compared with the effectiveness of the outcomes of the programmes. That question might be one for Kevin Rush.
Economy and Fair Work Committee
Meeting date: 4 December 2024
Michelle Thomson
My final question picks up on points that my colleague Kevin Stewart was making earlier, but I want to focus a bit more on communities. Stuart Bews highlighted that, as is the case everywhere, a lot of this is done in public, but that does not necessarily excite communities. How have you endeavoured to make sure that you are delivering through people and not to people in the work that you are doing? The question is for all the witnesses.
Economy and Fair Work Committee
Meeting date: 4 December 2024
Michelle Thomson
Thank you. Matt Bailey, I can see that you want to come in.
11:15Economy and Fair Work Committee
Meeting date: 4 December 2024
Michelle Thomson
What, then, is different in governance terms? That suggests to me that, because a pause could put in place, a pause was put in place. In other words, the Government scanned the horizon and looked at where it could do that. What was different about the two deals?
Economy and Fair Work Committee
Meeting date: 4 December 2024
Michelle Thomson
Susan Aitken, given the dispersity of the geography of your area, do you agree with that statement that the deals have brought a sharpness of focus?
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 3 December 2024
Michelle Thomson
I was going to ask about the fiscal framework, in which the IFS had quite a key role. You raised some concerns at the time around limits, noting that,
“rather than link the limits to inflation, it would make more sense to link them to the amount of revenue and social security spending at risk, which will typically grow faster than inflation.”
With the benefit of hindsight, what further recommendations might you have made, and do you still stand by what you said at the time?
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 3 December 2024
Michelle Thomson
Good morning. I have a mix of questions as well, given that we are nearly at the end of the evidence session. I will start almost at the beginning. You have been quite critical about the extent to which you really see the UK budget as a budget for growth. Indeed, you suggest that the OBR thinks that
“the Budget will eventually boost output in a sustainable way, but only from 2032”.
We have also heard commentary about the front loading.
Given that wider context of really limited growth—of course, Brexit is in the room as well—and the limitations on the Scottish Government, on which David Phillips is obviously an expert, having done the work on the fiscal framework, in what ways can the Scottish Government really focus on making its budget one for growth?