The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of ˿ and committees will automatically update to show only the ˿ and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of ˿ and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of ˿ and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 1608 contributions
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 29 April 2025
Michelle Thomson
I have a couple of little compliments for you, which I want you to enjoy, because it does not happen very often. I was pleased to note that you say that the annual budget gap
“can be thought of as the Scottish-specific fiscal sustainability challenge.”
That terminology is considerably more helpful. You will know that I have passed comment previously on some of the terminology used because it frames Scotland as part of the wider context, including some of the issues relating to the UK economy and fiscal sustainability.
My other observation is that the development of age-sex spending profiles will be really helpful for us in getting greater clarity. That is the nice bit over.
I want to pick up on fiscal sustainability generally in the light of the earlier conversation with the Auditor General, which you will have heard. I think that we all agree that we want more resolute forward planning via the MTFS. However, regarding the debt to gross domestic product ratio, the projection that debt will be 274 per cent of GDP by 2070 is utterly astounding and re-emphasises my point that the Scottish economy and the fiscal framework must be mindful of the position.
How on earth do you and the Government start to fairly reflect the significant implications of that position, which is clearly not sustainable? We will see the UK spending review, but if we are on a whole different trajectory—assuming all things are equal, with the same focus on economic policy, although that could change—I would appreciate your reflections on how on earth you will present that position with meaning to this committee at least, if not to the wider public.
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 29 April 2025
Michelle Thomson
That is very helpful. I totally appreciate the complexity. The issue is not just about trying not to make people depressed; your reports could easily become as long as “War and Peace”.
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 29 April 2025
Michelle Thomson
Thank you for joining us. I have only a few questions.
First, you observed that your spending projections are based on current policies and do not take account of an additional main challenge—climate change. It would be useful to understand why your projections do not include any consideration of mitigations or adaptations. I am sure that there are several very good reasons for that. What would need to happen in order for you to give at least some consideration of climate change mitigation, given the significant anticipated public sector spend in that area?
Economy and Fair Work Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 23 April 2025
Michelle Thomson
I will move on to something that has not come up yet. To what extent are the views of industry fairly reflected in shaping the policy and provision? It is good that you are here this morning, but I am talking about apart from that.
Economy and Fair Work Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 23 April 2025
Michelle Thomson
To be clear, I am not seeking to have a pop at any of you; I am trying to understand how you see the skills system as currently structured in your industry and whether it positively encourages women. It is more of a generic question.
I see that Stevie Wilson wants to come in.
10:30Economy and Fair Work Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 23 April 2025
Michelle Thomson
I have one more question that I will roll in. This morning, we have all mentioned the rapid change driven by net zero and artificial intelligence. I would appreciate your reflections on what flexibility needs to be built into the system so that we are poised and ready. I appreciate that that is a massive area.
Doug, perhaps you can answer that and pick up on the earlier point.
Economy and Fair Work Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 23 April 2025
Michelle Thomson
Good morning, and thank you for joining us. I want to pick up a thread that, I think, Tony Burns started on when he talked about underrepresented groups. In your industries, how can you target girls and women? What are your reflections on the skills system for them? If we are bringing in a the pairts, obviously, some of your industries tend to be male dominated, so I would appreciate your thoughts and reflections on that.
Economy and Fair Work Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 23 April 2025
Michelle Thomson
What about you, Jennifer? Obviously, I appreciate that this is sometimes a function of scale.
Economy and Fair Work Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 23 April 2025
Michelle Thomson
Thank you very much.
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 22 April 2025
Michelle Thomson
Thanks for attending this morning. I have a general question about what the public sees from the processes. We are charting quite dangerous courses where people fail to pay attention to data and analysis. You have clearly outlined the complexity and risks of what you are doing. To what extent do you actively consider how the public can easily consume the very complex data and processes that you have to go through? Arguably, because of the complexity of the fiscal framework in Scotland, that issue is even more acute for us. I know that the Scottish Fiscal Commission has been considering that issue, but I am interested in your reflections.