The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of ³ÉÈË¿ìÊÖ and committees will automatically update to show only the ³ÉÈË¿ìÊÖ and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of ³ÉÈË¿ìÊÖ and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of ³ÉÈË¿ìÊÖ and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 1156 contributions
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 3 June 2025
Karen Adam
Thank you so much. That brings us to the end of our session with our first panel. If members have asked all the questions that they wished to ask, I give members of the panel an opportunity to make any additional comments that they would like to make.
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 27 May 2025
Karen Adam
Good morning, and welcome to the 14th meeting in 2025, in session 6, of the Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee. We have received apologies from Maggie Chapman, and Paul O’Kane and Tess White join us remotely.
Our first agenda item is a decision on whether to take in private agenda item 3, which is an opportunity for the committee to consider its annual report. Do we agree to take that item in private?
Members indicated agreement.
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 27 May 2025
Karen Adam
Thank you. We move to questions, and I will kick us off. Our inquiry witnesses so far have all indicated that they would like to see a significant increase in investment in legal aid. Why does the Scottish Legal Aid Board not think that fee increases are enough to deal with the issues that we currently face in the civil legal aid system?
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 27 May 2025
Karen Adam
Do you think that fee increases should not happen, or do you think that they should happen, along with other changes of structure?
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 27 May 2025
Karen Adam
Over the past few weeks, witnesses have made a number of suggestions about lessening the administrative burden on solicitors. One was that the double audit should be removed, and another was that SLAB should deal directly with third parties on payment of outlays. What are your thoughts on those suggestions?
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 27 May 2025
Karen Adam
Thank you—it is helpful to know your opinion on that.
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 27 May 2025
Karen Adam
Thank you. We move on to questions from Marie McNair.
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 27 May 2025
Karen Adam
That brings to a close the evidence-taking session with our first panel of witnesses, but I just want to ensure that all members have been able to ask everything that they wish to ask.
I see that Marie McNair wants to come in.
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 27 May 2025
Karen Adam
Thank you. That brings our first evidence session to a close, and I suspend the meeting briefly.
11:10 Meeting suspended.Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 27 May 2025
Karen Adam
Our second agenda item is an evidence session on our civil legal aid inquiry. In the inquiry, the committee is exploring what is and is not working in the current legal aid system and what changes could be made in the shorter and longer terms to address issues around access to civil legal aid. I refer members to papers 1 and 2.
I welcome the first of two panels of witnesses. From the Scottish Legal Aid Board, we will hear from Colin Lancaster, who is the chief executive, and Marie-Louise Fox, who is the director of strategic development. You are both very welcome. I invite Colin to give us an opening statement.