The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of ³ÉÈË¿ìÊÖ and committees will automatically update to show only the ³ÉÈË¿ìÊÖ and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of ³ÉÈË¿ìÊÖ and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of ³ÉÈË¿ìÊÖ and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 1111 contributions
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee
Meeting date: 30 April 2024
Karen Adam
Good morning, and welcome to the 11th meeting in 2024 of the Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee. We have no apologies this morning.
There has been a late change in the order of our agenda this morning. Our evidence session on suicide prevention in Scotland will now take place at item 2. Stage 2 proceedings on the Gender Representation on Public Boards (Amendment) (Scotland) Bill will be taken as item 3.
Our first item is consideration of a proposal by the Scottish Government to consent to the United Kingdom Government legislating in a devolved area, as set out in the proposed UK statutory instrument, the Recognition and Enforcement of Judgments (2019 Hague Convention etc) Regulations 2024. I refer members to paper 1.
Members will note that the Minister for Victims and Community Safety first wrote to the committee on 19 March to notify members of the Scottish Government’s proposal to consent to the UK SI, which, at that time, the UK Government intended to lay on 6 May. The minister wrote to us last week, on Thursday 25 April, to advise that the laying date is now due to be between 29 April and 2 May but said that that would not affect the process for the UK Government obtaining the consent of the Scottish ministers.
Are members content that the provisions set out in the notification should be made in the proposed UK instrument?
Members indicated agreement.
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee
Meeting date: 30 April 2024
Karen Adam
Thank you for that. We move to questions from the committee. I will kick off with the first question, which is about the creating hope together strategy. Professor O’Connor mentioned that the suicide rate has increased. What impacts do you think that the strategy has had?
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee
Meeting date: 30 April 2024
Karen Adam
Were there any gaps in the previous strategy that are now covered by the new creating hope together strategy?
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee
Meeting date: 30 April 2024
Karen Adam
I turn to staff training. From your perspective as healthcare providers, are there areas of development that could help healthcare staff to realise the new strategy?
11:30Rural Affairs and Islands Committee
Meeting date: 24 April 2024
Karen Adam
That is helpful.
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee
Meeting date: 24 April 2024
Karen Adam
Under the instrument, Scottish ministers will be able to serve a data transmission request notice. What is your understanding of what that means, and do you have any thoughts on that?
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee
Meeting date: 23 April 2024
Karen Adam
Good morning, and welcome to the 10th meeting in 2024 of the Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee. We have no apologies.
Our first agenda item is consideration of a continued petition, PE1787, on the use of Makaton sign language in the legal system. I refer members to paper 1.
At our meeting in late February last year, committee members discussed how much further we could progress the petition, given its narrow scope. We ultimately kept the petition open to seek further information, as is outlined in paragraph 3 of the paper, and that information is summarised in paragraphs 5 and 6. The clerks recently received an update from Scottish Government officials, which is included in full as an annex to the paper and is summarised in paragraphs 8 to 10.
We are invited to consider whether to close the petition at this point. Although there is no specific set guidance on the use of Makaton in the legal system, a number of policies, duties and practices are in place that are designed to ensure that relevant authorities provide as much support as possible for people to communicate in a way that is most accessible to them.
As no member has indicated that they have any thoughts on those points, do we agree to close the petition?
Members indicated agreement.
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee
Meeting date: 23 April 2024
Karen Adam
We are therefore agreed to close the petition under rule 15.7 of standing orders, on the basis that a number of measures are in place to make communication as accessible as possible. There might be further opportunities for the petitioner and others to highlight consideration of Makaton in future legislation, including the Scottish human rights bill.
I thank petitioner Sandra Docherty for lodging the petition and for helping to raise awareness of Makaton.
10:02 Meeting suspended.Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee
Meeting date: 23 April 2024
Karen Adam
Rebecca Hoffman, you said you felt that the needs of the LGBT community were not picked up on in the previous strategy. My question is for all the witnesses. Do you feel that there are any gaps that were not addressed and that the new strategy will address?
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee
Meeting date: 23 April 2024
Karen Adam
That is important. The panel has mentioned some challenges that the new strategy might face. Aidan Mitchell, you spoke about the need for joined-up thinking across sectors. We are not just firefighting—we are getting to the crux of what is causing the problem in the first instance. Do you see any challenges in the strategy, and are there any weak points that you would like to point out?