The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of 成人快手 and committees will automatically update to show only the 成人快手 and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of 成人快手 and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of 成人快手 and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 931 contributions
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 29 April 2025
Marie McNair
Maybe we could go to Lucy.
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 29 April 2025
Marie McNair
You have probably already touched on my final question. How well do the disability-related benefits in Scotland reflect the human rights model of disability that is endorsed by international bodies? Lucy, you have touched on that already, but I am just throwing it out to the panel to see whether you want to expand on that.
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 29 April 2025
Marie McNair
Absolutely. We also face digital poverty.
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 29 April 2025
Marie McNair
That would be okay, Lorne, if you would not mind. Does anyone else want to come in on that one?
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 29 April 2025
Marie McNair
Another committee is holding evidence sessions on the matter that you are talking about.
I will move on to my second question. I am sorry about this, convener, but I will be quick. Lorne Berkley, CESCR urged a review of the digital-only system for social security. In Scotland, we have a choice of online and paper applications for social security. What is your experience of the main barriers that those systems present to rights realisation? Scotland鈥檚 system is fairer, but we could still make a lot of improvements to make it even fairer.
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 29 April 2025
Marie McNair
Thank you. I really appreciate those comments. We could indeed have a full session on social security and poverty, and I hope that we will follow that up.
Does anyone else want to comment before I move on?
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 29 April 2025
Marie McNair
Does anyone else want to come in on my first question?
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 29 April 2025
Marie McNair
Good morning. I thank the witnesses for their time this morning. The committee really appreciates it.
My first question is on social security, and I will direct it to Lorne Berkley. The concluding observations highlight concerns about the two-child limit, universal credit delays and benefit caps. I am interested to know how those policies are impacting the people and communities that you work with, Lorne.
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 29 April 2025
Marie McNair
I will be brief in my remarks. I certainly accept the decision of the Supreme Court. It is correct that we can agree or disagree with what Maggie Chapman has said or believes. It has been helpful that Maggie Chapman has confirmed that she was not speaking in her capacity as deputy convener of the committee and that she was speaking up on behalf of her constituents. I feel that we have no control over what any member of the committee says in their personal capacity. It would be helpful if Maggie spoke again to clarify the points that were raised by our colleague Paul O鈥橩ane.
I do not consider this to be a matter for the committee to decide on, and I cannot support the motion that Tess White has lodged. I will oppose it, but I will listen to further contributions by other members.
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 29 April 2025
Marie McNair
I certainly agree that we can go further.