The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of ³ÉÈË¿ìÊÖ and committees will automatically update to show only the ³ÉÈË¿ìÊÖ and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of ³ÉÈË¿ìÊÖ and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of ³ÉÈË¿ìÊÖ and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 949 contributions
Social Justice and Social Security Committee
Meeting date: 28 March 2024
Marie McNair
Good morning, panel. We appreciate you coming along to our committee again.
Mr Gass, what experience do you have of supporting clients with Social Security Scotland benefit appeals? How does it differ from appeals on reserved benefits?
Social Justice and Social Security Committee
Meeting date: 28 March 2024
Marie McNair
I have one more question, with your indulgence, convener. Mr Gass, you mentioned standard letters. Does that apply to appeals? What are the benefits of those types of letters being accepted when an appeal is lodged?
Social Justice and Social Security Committee
Meeting date: 28 March 2024
Marie McNair
I will move on to Ms Young. In your organisation’s written submission, you refer to
“prolonged wait times for an appeal to be listed, poor communication and administrative ‘hold-ups’â€
arising from Social Security Scotland and the tribunal service. Can you expand on the issues that clients are facing?
Social Justice and Social Security Committee
Meeting date: 28 March 2024
Marie McNair
Thanks for that. I could go on but I had better hand back to the convener.
10:30Social Justice and Social Security Committee
Meeting date: 28 March 2024
Marie McNair
In earlier evidence, the committee heard concerns that tribunal hearings are being held over the phone rather than in person. How does that practice affect the quality of decision making? Are there any potential implications of that for a human rights-based approach to social security? I put that question to either of you.
Social Justice and Social Security Committee
Meeting date: 28 March 2024
Marie McNair
Do you think that standard letters should and could be accepted by the First-tier Tribunal for Scotland?
Social Justice and Social Security Committee
Meeting date: 28 March 2024
Marie McNair
Thank you. Tribunals are independent, but, given the resource available to Social Security Scotland compared with the appellant, do you think that the correct balance is given when allowing flexibility to both sides? For example, how easy is it for the appellant to secure an adjournment compared with Social Security Scotland?
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee
Meeting date: 26 March 2024
Marie McNair
Good morning, minister. Thank you for your update about the delivery plan. I will cover access to PrEP. What are you doing to address the problems of access for groups that are less likely to access PrEP? I refer to women, the transgender community and black and ethnic minority folk, to name a few.
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee
Meeting date: 26 March 2024
Marie McNair
That is key. We have also heard that it is much more expensive to administer PrEP through community pharmacies, even though that might be more convenient for folk who need it. Why is that and how do we address it?
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee
Meeting date: 26 March 2024
Marie McNair
There is concern that resource that is freed up from the ePrEP pilot might be diverted away from specialist sexual health services. What assurances can you give the committee that that will not happen and that it will be directed towards ensuring that underrepresented people have support to access ePrEP?