The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of ³ÉÈË¿ìÊÖ and committees will automatically update to show only the ³ÉÈË¿ìÊÖ and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of ³ÉÈË¿ìÊÖ and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of ³ÉÈË¿ìÊÖ and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 1089 contributions
Education, Children and Young People Committee
Meeting date: 17 September 2025
Jackie Dunbar
Can you expand on that? When would you feel that it would be appropriate to have a single-member panel? Up to which level? I am not sure whether that is the right word to use.
Education, Children and Young People Committee
Meeting date: 17 September 2025
Jackie Dunbar
Should it be every time, or only when needed?
Education, Children and Young People Committee
Meeting date: 17 September 2025
Jackie Dunbar
Good afternoon. I have questions regarding the children’s hearings part of the bill. The hearings system working group has recommended that the obligation on a child to attend a hearing should be replaced by a presumption. The bill removes the obligation for the child, but it does not include the presumption. The Fostering Network has suggested that that could cause issues as it would erode a child’s right to attend and the safeguarding of their rights. I want to hear what Natalie Williams and Duncan Dunlop think should be in the bill on that. Should the obligation for a child to attend simply be removed, or should the bill add a presumption?
Education, Children and Young People Committee
Meeting date: 17 September 2025
Jackie Dunbar
I will be short and sweet and concise, too.
I go back to the comments from Mr Hogg and Mr Bermingham in response to the convener’s opening question regarding children’s hearings and their views on the proposal for single-member panels. Mr Hogg, you said that you were broadly supportive of the proposal but that you had some reservations. Could you go into a bit more detail about that, and say what further exploration you feel is necessary?
Education, Children and Young People Committee
Meeting date: 17 September 2025
Jackie Dunbar
Mr Forde, do you have anything to add to your previous comments?
Education, Children and Young People Committee
Meeting date: 10 September 2025
Jackie Dunbar
You said that COSLA has grave concerns about the cost of implementing the bill, and that it does not know what the total cost is. Coming from a local government background, I know that if the Scottish Government asks local government to do something, local government expects the Government to fund it wholly and not just partly. Would that be the case this time?
Education, Children and Young People Committee
Meeting date: 10 September 2025
Jackie Dunbar
If we have to change teachers’ terms and conditions to meet the provisions in the bill, which is what teachers told us would have to be done, do you have a rough idea of the cost attached to that? What would the process be for that?
Education, Children and Young People Committee
Meeting date: 10 September 2025
Jackie Dunbar
So that will be another cost unknown.
Education, Children and Young People Committee
Meeting date: 10 September 2025
Jackie Dunbar
Sorry for butting in, convener, but would the matter of a statement not be up to the Parliamentary Bureau rather than—
Education, Children and Young People Committee
Meeting date: 10 September 2025
Jackie Dunbar
Good morning to the witnesses, and thank you for coming along. I want to ask you basically the same questions that I asked the previous panel. What are your views on having single-member panels in certain circumstances? Regardless of your opinion on that, I would like to know the level at which decision making would happen if single-member panels were to come into force.