The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of 成人快手 and committees will automatically update to show only the 成人快手 and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of 成人快手 and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of 成人快手 and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 986 contributions
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee
Meeting date: 14 March 2024
Jackie Dunbar
I totally agree, and I think that there is a duty of care to both sides. Until you have reached the end of your investigation, you do not know what the outcome will be.
What correspondence is undertaken with both sides of the complaint during the process? There is nothing worse than being left and not responded to. Indeed, it can be bad for both sides.
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee
Meeting date: 14 March 2024
Jackie Dunbar
You have said that the waiting times are published on the website. I am going to be a bit rude鈥攆orgive me鈥攂ut those are just figures. How does someone know whether that is a reasonable amount of time to wait? Would waiting for four months for your case to be dealt with be seen as reasonable? Are people told that that is reasonable?
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 12 March 2024
Jackie Dunbar
Thank you, convener, and good morning, Auditor General. You have emphasised the need for greater priority to be given to climate change adaptation planning and risk management. In a statement to the Public Audit Committee, you said that there should be parity between emissions reduction and adaptation planning. Is that parity in terms of investment and resources or in terms of the approach taken to risk management?
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 12 March 2024
Jackie Dunbar
I take it from your response that you have seen and read the draft Scottish national adaptation plan, which my next question was going to come on to. Are you saying that its content helps to address the recommendations from your 2023 report? If so, should adaptation be given greater priority? I probably know the answer to that question, but I will ask it anyway.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 5 March 2024
Jackie Dunbar
With regard to establishing that review body, have you had any discussions with the Scottish Government about ESS taking on that role? Are you actively considering what expertise and resource would be needed to fulfil that role, should you take it on?
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 5 March 2024
Jackie Dunbar
How do you expect to engage in the legislative development of the proposed natural environment bill? I would be interested to hear your views on what the priorities of the bill should be.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 5 March 2024
Jackie Dunbar
Do you have the expertise in-house just now, or would you have to go further afield?
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 5 March 2024
Jackie Dunbar
Thank you.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 5 March 2024
Jackie Dunbar
I realise that I was asking a crystal ball question鈥攁sking you to look into the future鈥攕o I appreciate that answer.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 5 March 2024
Jackie Dunbar
I want to go back to what Bettina said earlier about the industry agreeing the reimbursement rates. Did the industry raise any concerns on that, or was there total agreement?