The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of ˿ and committees will automatically update to show only the ˿ and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of ˿ and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of ˿ and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 608 contributions
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 19 November 2025
Beatrice Wishart
Amendment 166 would add a target topic of biodiversity restoration against a historic baseline. In Scotland, species abundance and habitat extent have declined over multiple decades. If targets are set relative only to current levels, which are already depleted, there is a risk of masking long-term declines and focusing on slowing loss rather than delivering recovery. Targets should build on a long-term sense of the scale of ecological loss. The biodiversity intactness index is an existing metric for that approach. Requiring a target for restoration against a historic baseline would reflect the scale of the recovery that is required.
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 19 November 2025
Beatrice Wishart
My amendment 186 states that the Scottish ministers cannot remove any target topics. It would ensure that no future Scottish Government could weaken the legislation by removing topics that have been decided on and which require addressing through the targets.
My amendment 309 would bring section 1 into force on the day after royal assent, rather than leaving the date of its coming into force to the discretion of the Scottish ministers. Leaving the decision on when to bring it into force to the political preferences of the day could risk delays to measures to improve Scotland’s biodiversity. Mandating action by bringing the section into force on the day after royal assent reflects the need for action in the context of the climate and biodiversity emergency, as targets are only as good as the actions that are taken to deliver on them.
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 12 November 2025
Beatrice Wishart
My question is about section 8 and the three-croft limit. We have already heard about the streamlining of the family assignation process. We heard evidence from NFU Scotland that the three-croft limit could stifle active crofters in areas such as Shetland because of different patterns of land ownership. NFUS suggested a flexible and regionally sensitive approach, or applying the limit only to family assignations. How will the Scottish Government ensure that the fast-track process balances the need for administrative efficiency with the flexibility to account for regional differences in croft sizes and ownership patterns?
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 12 November 2025
Beatrice Wishart
Are you saying that there is some flexibility?
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 12 November 2025
Beatrice Wishart
Good morning. The Thornton greyhound track is thought to have ceased racing activity around the time that the bill was introduced. How do you think that that impacts on the need for the proposed legislation?
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 12 November 2025
Beatrice Wishart
The policy memorandum does not explain the Scottish Government’s reasons for the proposed merger of the Scottish Land Court and the Lands Tribunal for Scotland, and the Law Society of Scotland has expressed concern that the main driver could be to cut costs and reduce capacity. I note that you said that the proposal will create a “one-stop shop” and that there will be “no ... diminution of expertise”, but could you explain what the policy objective is for the merger? What reassurances can you give that resources and capacity will be maintained?
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 12 November 2025
Beatrice Wishart
The key area of disagreement between animal welfare groups in our targeted call for views was on restricting the ban to oval racetracks. Dogs Trust, for example, said that that might be a loophole. What is your response to that concern, and are you still confident that that is the correct approach?
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 12 November 2025
Beatrice Wishart
We know that the Thornton track is not operating at the moment, and we have heard from the Scottish Greyhound Sanctuary that there is a rehoming crisis. The lack of racing in Scotland has not reduced the number of greyhounds; the crisis relates to the churn of dogs that are still coming in from Ireland. Is there a need for more support in the rehoming sector in Scotland in general? Could your bill do anything to support the rehoming sector?
12:00Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 12 November 2025
Beatrice Wishart
I have a question about section 14, which concerns the commission’s powers to adjust boundaries. We have heard in evidence from legal stakeholders concerns about the possible conflict with title boundaries, which could create disputes. How will the bill ensure alignment between the crofting register and the land register while allowing practical boundary corrections?
09:45Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 12 November 2025
Beatrice Wishart
We heard in evidence from Brian Inkster that he thinks that the proposed provisions are “a recipe for disaster”.