˿

Skip to main content
Loading…

Chamber and committees

Official Report: search what was said in Parliament

The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.  

Filter your results Hide all filters

Dates of parliamentary sessions
  1. Session 1: 12 May 1999 to 31 March 2003
  2. Session 2: 7 May 2003 to 2 April 2007
  3. Session 3: 9 May 2007 to 22 March 2011
  4. Session 4: 11 May 2011 to 23 March 2016
  5. Session 5: 12 May 2016 to 4 May 2021
  6. Current session: 13 May 2021 to 18 December 2025
Select which types of business to include


Select level of detail in results

Displaying 608 contributions

|

Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]

Natural Environment (Scotland) Bill: Stage 2

Meeting date: 19 November 2025

Beatrice Wishart

Amendment 166 would add a target topic of biodiversity restoration against a historic baseline. In Scotland, species abundance and habitat extent have declined over multiple decades. If targets are set relative only to current levels, which are already depleted, there is a risk of masking long-term declines and focusing on slowing loss rather than delivering recovery. Targets should build on a long-term sense of the scale of ecological loss. The biodiversity intactness index is an existing metric for that approach. Requiring a target for restoration against a historic baseline would reflect the scale of the recovery that is required.

Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]

Natural Environment (Scotland) Bill: Stage 2

Meeting date: 19 November 2025

Beatrice Wishart

My amendment 186 states that the Scottish ministers cannot remove any target topics. It would ensure that no future Scottish Government could weaken the legislation by removing topics that have been decided on and which require addressing through the targets.

My amendment 309 would bring section 1 into force on the day after royal assent, rather than leaving the date of its coming into force to the discretion of the Scottish ministers. Leaving the decision on when to bring it into force to the political preferences of the day could risk delays to measures to improve Scotland’s biodiversity. Mandating action by bringing the section into force on the day after royal assent reflects the need for action in the context of the climate and biodiversity emergency, as targets are only as good as the actions that are taken to deliver on them.

Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]

Crofting and Scottish Land Court Bill: Stage 1

Meeting date: 12 November 2025

Beatrice Wishart

My question is about section 8 and the three-croft limit. We have already heard about the streamlining of the family assignation process. We heard evidence from NFU Scotland that the three-croft limit could stifle active crofters in areas such as Shetland because of different patterns of land ownership. NFUS suggested a flexible and regionally sensitive approach, or applying the limit only to family assignations. How will the Scottish Government ensure that the fast-track process balances the need for administrative efficiency with the flexibility to account for regional differences in croft sizes and ownership patterns?

Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]

Crofting and Scottish Land Court Bill: Stage 1

Meeting date: 12 November 2025

Beatrice Wishart

Are you saying that there is some flexibility?

Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]

Greyhound Racing (Offences) (Scotland) Bill: Stage 1

Meeting date: 12 November 2025

Beatrice Wishart

Good morning. The Thornton greyhound track is thought to have ceased racing activity around the time that the bill was introduced. How do you think that that impacts on the need for the proposed legislation?

Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]

Crofting and Scottish Land Court Bill: Stage 1

Meeting date: 12 November 2025

Beatrice Wishart

The policy memorandum does not explain the Scottish Government’s reasons for the proposed merger of the Scottish Land Court and the Lands Tribunal for Scotland, and the Law Society of Scotland has expressed concern that the main driver could be to cut costs and reduce capacity. I note that you said that the proposal will create a “one-stop shop” and that there will be “no ... diminution of expertise”, but could you explain what the policy objective is for the merger? What reassurances can you give that resources and capacity will be maintained?

Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]

Greyhound Racing (Offences) (Scotland) Bill: Stage 1

Meeting date: 12 November 2025

Beatrice Wishart

The key area of disagreement between animal welfare groups in our targeted call for views was on restricting the ban to oval racetracks. Dogs Trust, for example, said that that might be a loophole. What is your response to that concern, and are you still confident that that is the correct approach?

Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]

Greyhound Racing (Offences) (Scotland) Bill: Stage 1

Meeting date: 12 November 2025

Beatrice Wishart

We know that the Thornton track is not operating at the moment, and we have heard from the Scottish Greyhound Sanctuary that there is a rehoming crisis. The lack of racing in Scotland has not reduced the number of greyhounds; the crisis relates to the churn of dogs that are still coming in from Ireland. Is there a need for more support in the rehoming sector in Scotland in general? Could your bill do anything to support the rehoming sector?

12:00  

Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]

Crofting and Scottish Land Court Bill: Stage 1

Meeting date: 12 November 2025

Beatrice Wishart

I have a question about section 14, which concerns the commission’s powers to adjust boundaries. We have heard in evidence from legal stakeholders concerns about the possible conflict with title boundaries, which could create disputes. How will the bill ensure alignment between the crofting register and the land register while allowing practical boundary corrections?

09:45  

Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]

Crofting and Scottish Land Court Bill: Stage 1

Meeting date: 12 November 2025

Beatrice Wishart

We heard in evidence from Brian Inkster that he thinks that the proposed provisions are “a recipe for disaster”.